Residents of Rock Creek, MT fight back against Oregon developer
This is a microcosm of what is going on all over the West — out-of-state developer comes in; local residents are no longer passive, and they fight back.
Read about the Rock Creek struggle (Rock Creek is one of the most famous fishing streams in the West).
Unfortunately, and there has been little publicity so far, a New York developer and libertarian organizations have used paid signature gatherers to get a ballot initiative this fall in almost every Western state. This initiative basically says abolish all your laws regulating land use, or pay (usually a developer) for the diminishment of his or her land value (as when they can’t legally sub-divide agricultural land).
In Montana it is Initiative 154.
It is being advertised as a way to protect your property rights, but in fact the ones “protected” are those who are economically and politically powerful. For accuracy’s sake, these initiatives should be named “the bad neighbor empowerment act.”
Update, Great News on the Montana ballot initiatives!
“Judge throws out ballot initiatives”
By CHELSI MOY
Great Falls Tribune Staff Writer
Judge says a “pervasive and general pattern of fraud” in signature gathering! Nevertheless, Idaho, Washington, California, and other Western states still have to face this sleazy attack on their land by these out-of-state forces. It could shake down the taxpayers for billions of dollars even as it abolishes all land use laws.
Update on Sept. 19. Courts strike down “property rights” initiative in three more states.”

Ralph Maughan
Dr. Ralph Maughan is professor emeritus of political science at Idaho State University with specialties in natural resource politics, public opinion, interest groups, political parties, voting and elections. Aside from academic publications, he is author or co-author of three hiking/backpacking guides, and he is President of the Western Watersheds Project.
One Response to Residents of Rock Creek, MT fight back against Oregon developer
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Recent Posts
- The Attack on Wilderness from Environmentalists April 20, 2018
- Daines and Gianforte mislead on wildfire and forest health April 17, 2018
- Little Belts “Vegetation Treatment” displays FS bias April 8, 2018
- Do you have some interesting wildlife news? April 6, 2018 edition April 5, 2018
- Forester vs Ecologist March 29, 2018
Recent Comments
- Ida Lupine on Do you have some interesting wildlife news? April 6, 2018 edition
- Ida Lupine on The Attack on Wilderness from Environmentalists
- Mareks Vilkins on The Attack on Wilderness from Environmentalists
- Nancy Ostlie on The Attack on Wilderness from Environmentalists
- louise kane on Do you have some interesting wildlife news? April 6, 2018 edition
- louise kane on Do you have some interesting wildlife news? April 6, 2018 edition
- louise kane on Do you have some interesting wildlife news? April 6, 2018 edition
- Natalie Riehl on Daines and Gianforte mislead on wildfire and forest health
- Kathleen on The Attack on Wilderness from Environmentalists
- Kathleen on Do you have some interesting wildlife news? April 6, 2018 edition
- snaildarter on The Attack on Wilderness from Environmentalists
- Kathleen on Do you have some interesting wildlife news? April 6, 2018 edition
- Dave Nielsen on The Attack on Wilderness from Environmentalists
- Denise Boggs on The Attack on Wilderness from Environmentalists
- Barbara Moritsch on The Attack on Wilderness from Environmentalists
Ralph, I agree with your assessment of the impact of these initiatives. I’m concerned there has been no organized resistance to the initiative in Idaho. What do you know about this?