This story has appeared in a number of newspapers. This one is from the Union of Concerned Scientists about the actions of BushCo at the top of the Dept. of Interior.

“High-ranking political appointees within the Department of the Interior have rewritten numerous scientific documents to prevent the protection of several highly imperiled species under the Endangered Species Act.” Read the rest in this article

Here is more about the matter from the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, plus a story about “habitat conservation plans” (part of the ESA) and the problems with them. HCAs were a not-so-great innovation of the Clinton Administration.

In the election tomorrow, for the sake of their country and the outdoors, I hope Americans will reject those candidates who have disrespected science so much over the last six years.

 
avatar
About The Author

Ralph Maughan

Dr. Ralph Maughan is professor emeritus of political science at Idaho State University with specialties in natural resource politics, public opinion, interest groups, political parties, voting and elections. Aside from academic publications, he is author or co-author of three hiking/backpacking guides, and he is President of the Western Watersheds Project.

5 Responses to Systematic Interference with Science at Interior Department Exposed

  1. avatar Alan Gregory says:

    We’re about to kick Rick Santorum out, for starters, here in PA.

  2. He seems to have taken a very anti-science stance, good.

  3. avatar Rick Hammel says:

    Ahh, the light is beginning to come through. Two of these species whose listings were altered, were the greater ssage grouse and the white-tail prarie dog. And what industry would be most significantly affected by their listing, besides ranching? Oil and gas, who has the most clout of any industry under Bushco.

    Afer tomorrow, those petitions should be revisited!

  4. avatar Mike says:

    I saw some recent poll numbers that look really great! CNN as of today has the Dems up 20 points, Newsweek has them at 16 up.

    I also saw Tester up by 7 in Montana in todays polls.

    Like you say, I really hope the anti-science crowd is thrown out, and pro-public lands representatives are installed in their place.

    I hear Idaho of all places has races that are much closer than previously thought.

    Here in Illinois things are looking good except for Hastert’s numbers. But if all goes well, he will be the House minority leader, and as we all know that means nothing at all.

    How hard is it for Interior Department heads and the heads of the USFS workers to just do the right thing? It amazes me the troubles they go through to do the exact opposite of the right thing. Clearly they are some very crooked people.

  5. Because they have been out of power, it’s hard to know what the Democrats will stand for if they are elected to be the majority party.
    I have come to think that the governing coalition (the various wings that make up the Republican Party) is quite unique in that they reject the idea that there is, in fact, a public interest. How often does the President say “the public,” as opposed to “Americans,” ” the people,” etc.? He defines us by our status as part of a nation rather than our status as citizens.
    Despite the contention by cultural conservatives that absolute Truth exists, their quest for power follows the rule of “say anything that works regardless of its truth.”

Calendar

November 2006
S M T W T F S
« Oct   Dec »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Quote

‎"At some point we must draw a line across the ground of our home and our being, drive a spear into the land and say to the bulldozers, earthmovers, government and corporations, “thus far and no further.” If we do not, we shall later feel, instead of pride, the regret of Thoreau, that good but overly-bookish man, who wrote, near the end of his life, “If I repent of anything it is likely to be my good behaviour."

~ Edward Abbey

%d bloggers like this: