The Wyoming Association of Conservation Districts wants to try cloud seeding to increase snowfall over the tall Wind River Range (the highest mountains in Wyoming).

Because the Winds are mostly designated Wilderness, this human modification is controversial. However, by far the largest change to the range is the huge increase in human pollution just beneath the Winds from the massive natural gas developments.

Cloud seeding is controversial because if it works it can harm stream beds and wildlife habitat and probably robs downwind areas of precipitation. However, Wyoming has been seeding clouds over the Salt River Range for years, and storms usually pass over this Idaho/Wyoming border ranger before reaching the Winds. Would cloud seeding even things out?

Story in the Jackson Hole News and Guide by Cory Hatch.

windrivcrest3.jpg
Crest of the Wind River Range. Bridger Wilderness Area. Copyright Ralph Maughan

 
avatar
About The Author

Ralph Maughan

Dr. Ralph Maughan is professor emeritus of political science at Idaho State University with specialties in natural resource politics, public opinion, interest groups, political parties, voting and elections. Aside from academic publications, he is author or co-author of three hiking/backpacking guides, and he is President of the Western Watersheds Project.

4 Responses to Cloud seeding plan for the Wind River Range stirs fears

  1. avatar kt says:

    Once again, manipulation of natural processes to produce cows in the arid West. That’s the reason behind this cloud seeding. Human domestic water or other uses are likely only a fraction of a percent of the use for irrigated agriculture to grow cattle.

    Plus,livestock grazing on public lands in watershed across the hydrologic basins affected by this proposal results in increased desertification (as described in the recent United Nations report on Global Warming: “Livestock’s Long Shadow” and more rapid runoff – and NOT slow, sustained release.

    Instead of rushing to do a CE here, the Forest should analyze resting these watersheds from grazing for awhile, and see how the watersheds may change.

    Does anyone know how much of the runoff from these drainages goes for irrigated cow pasture downstream? Or how many stock ponds and spring developemnts and pipelines ouside the Wilderness on public land divert and alter downstream flows? Is there a study for the water budget and uses for the area that might benefit?

  2. avatar Mike says:

    I find this story to be disturbing on several levels. First, if pollution is interrupting the natural process in the Winds, then you need to cut back on the gas wells.

    If seeding can help the snowpack, that’s a good thing. But if it harms the streams and habitat, it’s probably not worth it.

    With the new congress, perhaps we can work to get some sort of bill passed that will remove some of theover-abundance of gas wells in pristine areas.

    Great picture too. It makes you feel like you are there.

  3. avatar Mike says:

    Also, Ralph I noticed you changed the site. Were you not happy with the previous look? I like both styles, so I’m just curious.

  4. I thought the old theme wasted a lot of space. It also would not let me post a photo wider than 500 by X pixels.

Calendar

Quote

‎"At some point we must draw a line across the ground of our home and our being, drive a spear into the land and say to the bulldozers, earthmovers, government and corporations, “thus far and no further.” If we do not, we shall later feel, instead of pride, the regret of Thoreau, that good but overly-bookish man, who wrote, near the end of his life, “If I repent of anything it is likely to be my good behaviour."

~ Edward Abbey

%d bloggers like this: