Pinedale, WY people fume on ozone
Pinedale, WY people fume on ozone. Casper Star Tribune. By Chris Merrill.
. . . the result of the industrialization of Wyoming’s open spaces by the gas industry.
This is a specific example and it fleshes out the earlier post on this web site, Recovering From Wyoming’s Energy Bender.

Ralph Maughan
Dr. Ralph Maughan is professor emeritus of political science at Idaho State University. He has been a Western Watersheds Project Board Member off and on for many years, and also its President. For many years he produced Ralph Maughan's Wolf Report. He was a founder of the Greater Yellowstone Coalition. He and Jackie Johnson Maughan wrote three editions of "Hiking Idaho." He also wrote "Beyond the Tetons" and "Backpacking Wyoming's Teton and Washakie Wilderness." He created and is the administrator of The Wildlife News.
One Response to Pinedale, WY people fume on ozone
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Recent Posts
- Western Rewilding Network Proposal August 9, 2022
- Holiday Farm Fire And Industrial Logging August 8, 2022
- Another Misleading New York Times Fire Article August 4, 2022
- San Pedro Grazing Challenged August 3, 2022
- M-44 Ban On Public Lands Near Enactment August 1, 2022
Recent Comments
- Ed Loosli on A Greater Yellowstone National Park Proposal
- Hiker on Western Rewilding Network Proposal
- Mark L on Western Rewilding Network Proposal
- rastadoggie on Holiday Farm Fire And Industrial Logging
- Rosemary Lowe on Western Rewilding Network Proposal
- Ida Lupine on Western Rewilding Network Proposal
- Ida Lupine on Western Rewilding Network Proposal
- Pat on Western Rewilding Network Proposal
- Laurinda Reinhart on Western Rewilding Network Proposal
- Glenn on Western Rewilding Network Proposal
- Sam on Holiday Farm Fire And Industrial Logging
- Jeff Lonn on Holiday Farm Fire And Industrial Logging
- Mark L on Another Misleading New York Times Fire Article
- Ida Lupine on M-44 Ban On Public Lands Near Enactment
- Beeline on Another Misleading New York Times Fire Article
Why didn’t the original EIS “daylight” these pollution issues prior to the development of these gas & oil fields? It appears that they are learning as they go & the original EIS is not worth the paper it was written on. Or maybe those responsible for preparing the first EIS did not “daylight” the effects because the project would not have been approved if all the facts were known.