State starts building wildlife-friendly roads. Sheep overpasses, elk collars: Call it road ecology. By Glen Creno. The Arizona Republic.
There have been quite a few similar stories in recent years. What I’d like to see is a study (other than Banff National Park where there have been a number) showing the magnitude of these improvements overall and the degree of success.
Print Friendly
Ralph Maughan
Dr. Ralph Maughan is professor emeritus of political science at Idaho State University with specialties in natural resource politics, public opinion, interest groups, political parties, voting and elections. Aside from academic publications, he is author or co-author of three hiking/backpacking guides, and he is past President of the Western Watersheds Project.
If you enjoyed this article, please consider sharing it!
I think it will help, I live in AZ and I go to Payson alot. the area ‘s where they have the elk warning lights the accidents have went down 60%. The flashing warning light give the drivers a heads up to slow down for the next few miles, drivers in AZ drive very fast, too fast. and I see them driving 70-80 mph in Payson, the mountain roads here are not real winding and dangerous, so folks just drive too fast. At least with the light telling them “hey there are elk on the road” they do become more aware and slow down. The under cross they made also has helped with accidents in that area with elk, deer, coyotes all wildlife. I think we need more of this, more than what they are going to do even. And folks that are speeding when they hit an animal should be fined for it. I will be interested to see how the new stuff they plan on doing will work out. Good I hope!
I grew up in Arizona, my g’ma had a couple restaurants in Payson. There is a small stretch of twisty windy hwy between there and Phoenix, but not much.
You are right April, they do drive like idiots!
I hope it helps.
I live in this area of Arizona, also. As far as being “wildlife friendly” I guess if you mean cutting down collisions, yes it works. However, most of these things are done with huge fences funneling the elk into very specific areas and creating very specific migration patterns. The end result for disease and forage can’t be good for the elk. They shouldn’t be called wildlife friendly, but “people friendly” would be a better name since they cut down on collisions. I bet the false migration patterns that are created actually will be more harmful to the elk populations than the few animals killed by autos. It sounds like a case of “finding fault with anything” but I bet those huge funnels around and under highways do deter migration.