Flathead County, Montana to consider large bond to conserve open space
Scenic Montana county with exploding population seeks $10-million from voters-
Whenever I visit the area, I try to take a few photos of the disappearing rural countryside.
Story: Flathead open space bond on ballot. By Michael Jamison of the Missoulian

Ralph Maughan
Dr. Ralph Maughan is professor emeritus of political science at Idaho State University with specialties in natural resource politics, public opinion, interest groups, political parties, voting and elections. Aside from academic publications, he is author or co-author of three hiking/backpacking guides, and he is President of the Western Watersheds Project.
6 Responses to Flathead County, Montana to consider large bond to conserve open space
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Recent Posts
- Public Land Livestock Fees Hit Rock-Bottom February 22, 2019
- Idaho BLM BOSH proposal will likely degrade rangelands February 20, 2019
- Reply to Gallatin Forest Partnership and Bike Club February 20, 2019
- Bill in Montana Legislature kills Possibility for Wild Bison in State February 18, 2019
- Treat homes, not forests, to reduce wildfire risk February 17, 2019
Recent Comments
- Frank Krosnicki on Public Land Livestock Fees Hit Rock-Bottom
- idaursine on Do you have some interesting wildlife news? Feb. 14, 2019 edition
- Judy Hoy on Do you have some interesting wildlife news? Feb. 14, 2019 edition
- idaursine on Idaho BLM BOSH proposal will likely degrade rangelands
- idaursine on Do you have some interesting wildlife news? Feb. 14, 2019 edition
- idaursine on Do you have some interesting wildlife news? Feb. 14, 2019 edition
- Mareks Vilkins on Do you have some interesting wildlife news? Feb. 14, 2019 edition
- Jack on More prescribed burning not likely to influence smoke
- Bruce Bowen on Idaho BLM BOSH proposal will likely degrade rangelands
- idaursine on Do you have some interesting wildlife news? Feb. 14, 2019 edition
- Chris Zinda on Reply to Gallatin Forest Partnership and Bike Club
- idaursine on Reply to Gallatin Forest Partnership and Bike Club
- Nancy Ostlie on Reply to Gallatin Forest Partnership and Bike Club
- idaursine on Do you have some interesting wildlife news? Feb. 14, 2019 edition
- rork on Do you have some interesting wildlife news? Feb. 14, 2019 edition
I drove through Kalispell this year and was shocked at how poorly planned and developed that city is. In fact, the whole section of 93 from Kalispell to Darby is quite sad.
I agree Mike. It is basically sprawl from Darby, Montana a couple hundred miles north to the border of British Columbia.
You can tell when you are approaching customs — the trophy homes built randomly along the highway come to an end. Once in B.C., all that ugly development immediately disappears.
This is one reason why the economy is in the toilet. An economy has to do something besides build homes for the relatively well off (or at least those who could secure some kind of mortgage).
Nice pic BTW. Did you get a chance to head into Glacier? Amazing colors on the east side this fall. Lots and lots of bear activity.
Good point about the economy. It seems the only thing keeping it afloat was the housing market. That’s a hollow shell.
Mike,
No. I didn’t go to Glacier. I went up to Fernie, BC and down into the headwaters of the North Fork of the Flathead. I wanted to see where the big coal pit mine would be.
Then I went north and explored around the Bull River.
Beautiful photo!
The really sad part is often the developers put in horrendous suburban sprawl for everyone else (to line their pockets), then they go find the beautiful land (that’s left) to live on themselves.
Open fields…ahhh… such a calming picture.