Judge Affirms Public Access to Science Advisory Committees
Woolgrowers try to spin the decision to muddy the waters on Bighorn/Domestic sheep disease
U.S. District Judge B. Lynn Winmill has voided the Payette National Forest Science Advisory Committee’s contribution to management decisions when it decides whether or not to ban or reduce domestic sheep grazing on the Payette National Forest.
Federal judge voids bighorn sheep disease report – AP
The Woolgrowers successful claim means that the public should have been granted access to ‘listen in on’ the Science Advisory Committee, which was assimilating and summarizing existing information. This decision cuts both ways, ensuring access for industry as well as conservation advocates. The Woolgrowers were not successful in overturning previous decisions restricting domestic sheep grazing.
The judge goes out of his way to affirm that the existing information, including the scientific data demonstrating evidence of disease transmission from domestic to wild sheep that the committee summarized, can still inform management actions.
Not included in the article is the irony that Mark Rey, former undersecretary for natural resources and agriculture for the Bush Administration, is the man responsible for establishing the science advisory committee at issue.
The AP story is inaccurate in one instance :
Idaho Conservation League Executive Director Jon Marvel, head of the Hailey, Idaho-based Western Watersheds Project, which is fighting grazing on public lands across the West
Jon Marvel is not ICL’s executive director.
One Response to Judge Affirms Public Access to Science Advisory Committees
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Recent Posts
- Western Rewilding Network Proposal August 9, 2022
- Holiday Farm Fire And Industrial Logging August 8, 2022
- Another Misleading New York Times Fire Article August 4, 2022
- San Pedro Grazing Challenged August 3, 2022
- M-44 Ban On Public Lands Near Enactment August 1, 2022
Recent Comments
- Hiker on Western Rewilding Network Proposal
- Mark L on Western Rewilding Network Proposal
- rastadoggie on Holiday Farm Fire And Industrial Logging
- Rosemary Lowe on Western Rewilding Network Proposal
- Ida Lupine on Western Rewilding Network Proposal
- Ida Lupine on Western Rewilding Network Proposal
- Pat on Western Rewilding Network Proposal
- Laurinda Reinhart on Western Rewilding Network Proposal
- Glenn on Western Rewilding Network Proposal
- Sam on Holiday Farm Fire And Industrial Logging
- Jeff Lonn on Holiday Farm Fire And Industrial Logging
- Mark L on Another Misleading New York Times Fire Article
- Ida Lupine on M-44 Ban On Public Lands Near Enactment
- Beeline on Another Misleading New York Times Fire Article
- Ida Lupine on Michael Garrity–Working to Protect the Northern Rockies Ecosystem
As I read Judge Winmill’s order, it basically says the Payette didn’t follow the correct procedures under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) in organizing the Bighorn Domestic Sheep Disease Transmission Panel. While the Payette is precluded from relying on the committee’s report in future decisions, it can still use the underlying data which was voluminous in citing the science of disease transmission. A procedural victory isn’t much of one.
Scuttlebutt in the Idaho bar is that Judge Winmill has gotten sensitive over the perception that he is in the pockets of enviro groups. Those of us who have appeared before him know that he is an excellent judge who takes the law and facts very seriously. Under Bush II, winning has been easy for enviro groups to show the agencies have not followed the law and failed to apply the best available science.
So my take is that Judge Winmill tossed a bone to industry groups in a decision that has no real meaning to show he can rule for both sides.