Utah's Matheson to introduce wilderness legislation for Wasatch Front
Bill would add about 26,000 acres to wilderness protected areas just east of Salt Lake City-
A pretty fair portion of the rugged divides between the major Wasatch Mountain canyons at Salt Lake City are already protected as Wilderness. Rep. Matheson proposes to add to the Mount Olympus, Twin Peaks and Lone Peak wilderness and establish a new Wilderness near between Parley’s and Mill Creek Canyon — Wayne Owens Grandeur Peak-Mount Aire Wilderness.
Utah has poor senators on Wilderness issues, making Senate passage a problem. In addition Senator Bennett is being challenged by a far rightist who doesn’t seem to believe there should be public lands.
[Representative] Matheson to introduce wilderness legislation. By Patty Henetz. The Salt Lake Tribune
Personally, I always loved hiking the rugged Wasatch and like seeing them conserved from development.

Ralph Maughan
Dr. Ralph Maughan is professor emeritus of political science at Idaho State University with specialties in natural resource politics, public opinion, interest groups, political parties, voting and elections. Aside from academic publications, he is author or co-author of three hiking/backpacking guides, and he is past President of the Western Watersheds Project.
4 Responses to Utah's Matheson to introduce wilderness legislation for Wasatch Front
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Recent Posts
- Bozeman Watershed Project Based on Flawed Assumptions April 7, 2021
- Livestock Influence On Soil Carbon Storage April 6, 2021
- Mexican wolf depredation investigations …. again April 5, 2021
- Antidote For Rural Sprawl–Land Use Zoning April 1, 2021
- The 99-Year Old Grandmother Argument–The Bias of Forestry Advocates March 30, 2021
Recent Comments
- Ida Lupine on Reader generated wildlife news.
- Ida Lupine on Reader generated wildlife news.
- Hiker on Reader generated wildlife news.
- Ed Loosli on Reader generated wildlife news.
- Nancy on Reader generated wildlife news.
- STG on Bozeman Watershed Project Based on Flawed Assumptions
- Rich on Mexican wolf depredation investigations …. again
- Tamara Bedic on Mexican wolf depredation investigations …. again
- Ed Loosli on Reader generated wildlife news.
- Ida Lupine on Reader generated wildlife news.
- Ida Lupine on Reader generated wildlife news.
- Ida Lupine on Reader generated wildlife news.
- Nancy on Reader generated wildlife news.
- Beeline on Livestock Influence On Soil Carbon Storage
- David Hoefer on Domestic Sheep Threaten Wild Bighorns
I wonder what SUWA thinks are the chances of this, and why he is doing it. You are so correct; Utah has always fought new wilderness designations.
I love how politicians can play the old rabbit in the hat trick…
The deal is that Matheson may very well LOSE the democratic party nomination in the convention due to his spate of anti-democrat votes including the most recent one against health care. The caucuses last month were virtual Tea Party conventions of “Anybody but Matheson” types, and Claudia Wright, another democrat is running against him for the nomination (and I as a delegate will vote for Wright).
So Matheson somehow needs to distract the party faithful before next months convention so what BETTER way than to want to provide wilderness status for some frankly irrelevant sections of the Wastach. Virtually everything listed is already forest service and protected due to watershed concerns.
A typical political smoke screen to obfuscate the obvious.
jdubya:
Thanks for the insider’s view!
Matheson is nothing more than a energy company lobbyist in a blue suite. He’s redder than most republicans, and no friend to Utah’s wilderness. This is a total PR move for the upcoming election.