Finally a second herd of Yellowstone bison being reestablished at Fort Peck, Montana
Finally, some Yellowstone bison moved to form the basis of a second (or more) herds-
Genetically pure bison were released in northeast Montana on the Fort Peck Indian Reservation today. The sudden move came after years of delay and after state officials signed an agreement with Assiniboine and Sioux tribal leaders.
While there are many bison in the United States, all but the Yellowstone bison are polluted with cattle genes. Montana cattle barons and the livestock associations had delayed and harassed the plan for years. Agreement also had to be reached between tribes.
The move came suddenly, apparently catching opponents flat-footed.
Biologists supported the move because any rare population of animals is made safer if it is not all in one place. These were locked inside Yellowstone Park.
Here is the Associated Press story by Matthew Brown as it appeared in the Washington Post.
Ralph Maughan
Dr. Ralph Maughan is professor emeritus of political science at Idaho State University with specialties in natural resource politics, public opinion, interest groups, political parties, voting and elections. Aside from academic publications, he is author or co-author of three hiking/backpacking guides.
6 Responses to Finally a second herd of Yellowstone bison being reestablished at Fort Peck, Montana
Recent Posts
- Conservation scientists oppose efforts to remove federal protections for wolves across the lower 48 states
- US Fish and Wildlife Service sued by Western Watersheds over the legal implication of grizzly bear disappearance
- Worry over dead bison found north of Yellowstone Park
- Do you have some interesting wildlife news? May 18, 2013 edition
- Chronic Wasting Disease closes in on Yellowstone
Recent Comments
- Louise Kane on Do you have some interesting wildlife news? May 18, 2013 edition
- timz on Conservation scientists oppose efforts to remove federal protections for wolves across the lower 48 states
- Louise Kane on Conservation scientists oppose efforts to remove federal protections for wolves across the lower 48 states
- jon on Do you have some interesting wildlife news? May 18, 2013 edition
- Ida Lupine on Conservation scientists oppose efforts to remove federal protections for wolves across the lower 48 states
- Richie G. on Conservation scientists oppose efforts to remove federal protections for wolves across the lower 48 states
- Immer Treue on Conservation scientists oppose efforts to remove federal protections for wolves across the lower 48 states
- Robert Goldman on Conservation scientists oppose efforts to remove federal protections for wolves across the lower 48 states
- Joseph C. Allen on Conservation scientists oppose efforts to remove federal protections for wolves across the lower 48 states
- Ida Lupine on Conservation scientists oppose efforts to remove federal protections for wolves across the lower 48 states
- Ida Lupine on Conservation scientists oppose efforts to remove federal protections for wolves across the lower 48 states
- john on Conservation scientists oppose efforts to remove federal protections for wolves across the lower 48 states
- john on Conservation scientists oppose efforts to remove federal protections for wolves across the lower 48 states
- john on Conservation scientists oppose efforts to remove federal protections for wolves across the lower 48 states
- Immer Treue on Conservation scientists oppose efforts to remove federal protections for wolves across the lower 48 states
Energy











So will these bison be free range?
No, eventually I believe the plan is to open up a significant amount of land, but initially I think I read they had 10,000 acres fenced and ready. Unfortunately, free ranging bison are a thing of the past.
Free range? That has become a term of acres for Wild or Domestic animals set in an artifical enveriorment! Nothing on this plantet is “FREE RANGE” it is all under juristiction! And 90% by people wanting to profit or develop it, or extract it!
http://www.idahostatesman.com/2012/03/20/2043924/judge-denies-request-to-stop-mont.html
Why aren’t Utah’s herds of bison ever mentioned when discussing wild, gentically pure bison. The Henry Mtns. herd might be the least molested (albeit hunted) wild bison herds left. Is this only because it is state rather than federally owned?
The Henry Mountains herd is hardly mentioned even though I think they are pure as they are descended from Yellowstone animals. Also, I thought the ones in Wind Cave National Park and the National Bison Range were pure.