Suit Filed to Protect Bighorn Sheep in Hells Canyon and Salmon River Canyon
Yesterday, Western Watersheds Project, Hells Canyon Preservation Council, and The Wilderness Society filed a motion in federal district court seeking to halt domestic sheep grazing on three allotments in the Payette National Forest in order to protect imperiled bighorn sheep in Hells Canyon, and native bighorns in the Salmon River Canyon.
In 2010, the Forest had agreed to phase in the closure of hundreds of thousands of acres of public land to grazing to protect Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep from fatal diseases transmitted by domestic sheep.
However, the agency intends to retreat from this plan by allowing grazing to continue in 2012 because of political pressure and a misreading of the language included in a rider on the 2012 Consolidated Appropriations Act.
The rider, originally inserted by Rep. Mike Simpson (ID), but later reworked into dramatically different final language capable of passing Congress, precludes the use of federal funds for:
“[M]anagement restrictions on domestic sheep [on Forest Service lands] in excess of the management restrictions that existed on July 1, 2011.”
The Payette Decision was finalized in 2010 and the management restrictions were already in place well before the rider’s deadline. In fact, the sole permittee affected by the Payette Decision this year signed the modified permit restricting use of the allotments at issue in February 2011, months prior to the rider’s restriction.
Brian Ertz
Brian Ertz serves as media director for Western Watersheds Project. All Posts by Brian Ertz | Facebook | Email
3 Responses to Suit Filed to Protect Bighorn Sheep in Hells Canyon and Salmon River Canyon
Recent Posts
- BLM Abuse of its Public Trust Duty – Conservationists Win Duck Creek Case
- Wildlife Services maybe to get more money to deal with feral swine
- Conservation scientists oppose efforts to remove federal protections for wolves across the lower 48 states
- US Fish and Wildlife Service sued by Western Watersheds over the legal implication of grizzly bear disappearance
- Worry over dead bison found north of Yellowstone Park
Recent Comments
- Ken Cole on BLM Abuse of its Public Trust Duty – Conservationists Win Duck Creek Case
- Patrick on BLM Abuse of its Public Trust Duty – Conservationists Win Duck Creek Case
- ma'iingan on Do you have some interesting wildlife news? May 18, 2013 edition
- JB on Do you have some interesting wildlife news? May 18, 2013 edition
- Ida Lupine on BLM Abuse of its Public Trust Duty – Conservationists Win Duck Creek Case
- Immer Treue on Do you have some interesting wildlife news? May 18, 2013 edition
- Robert R on Do you have some interesting wildlife news? May 18, 2013 edition
- Immer Treue on Wildlife Services maybe to get more money to deal with feral swine
- Ralph Maughan on BLM Abuse of its Public Trust Duty – Conservationists Win Duck Creek Case
- Ralph Maughan on US Fish and Wildlife Service sued by Western Watersheds over the legal implication of grizzly bear disappearance
- JB on Conservation scientists oppose efforts to remove federal protections for wolves across the lower 48 states
- Mark L on Wildlife Services maybe to get more money to deal with feral swine
- aves on Wildlife Services maybe to get more money to deal with feral swine
- Theo on Wildlife Services maybe to get more money to deal with feral swine
- aves on Do you have some interesting wildlife news? May 18, 2013 edition
Energy












I’ve heard that this “rider” from Representative Simpson is the ultimate in special favors legislation. It is a legislative provision that benefits just one large sheep operation.
You are correct, there is only one operator who benefits from Simpson’s rider and that is Soulen Livestock who has received $1.2 million in subsidies from taxpayers.
Mikey loves him some riders, doesn’t he?