WildEarth Guardians and Western Environmental Law Center sue U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for insufficient critical habitat to recover the lynx-

MISSOULA, Mont. — Today, Nov. 17, WildEarth Guardians represented by the Western Environmental Law Center filed suit against the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) for failing to designate as critical habitat large parts of the mountainous West vital to the recovery of threatened Canada lynx. Despite multiple court orders over the past eight years requiring the Service reconsider its attempts to limit the species’ protected habitat, on September 12, the agency finalized another revised critical habitat designation that again undermined the cat’s recovery by excluding large areas of important lynx habitat.

The lawsuit challenges the Service’s decision to exclude all lynx habitat in the Southern Rockies from the species’ critical habitat designation. The challenge also seeks to reverse the Service’s refusal to protect important occupied lynx habitat in Washington’s Kettle Range and Wedge areas, and parts of Idaho, Montana and Oregon. Lynx currently live in small populations throughout the Rockies in intact mature forests from Idaho and Montana to Colorado and New Mexico, but the Service ignored the best available science by excluding areas that support the snow-loving cats and the prey they depend on from protection.

“By again ignoring huge swaths of lynx habitat, the Service is undermining the benefits of protecting individual lynx wherever they are found in the lower forty-eight,” said Drew Kerr, carnivore advocate for WildEarth Guardians. “To recover in the American West, lynx need habitat protections throughout their range.”

The Service first listed lynx as a threatened species under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) in 2000. However, at that time the Service failed to protect any lynx habitat, impeding the species’ survival and recovery. Lynx habitat received no protection until 2006, and that initial critical habitat designation fell short of meeting the species’ needs and the ESA’s standards. After two additional lawsuits brought by conservationists challenging the Service’s critical habitat designations culminated in 2008 and 2010, a district court in Montana left the agency’s meager lynx habitat protection in place while remanded it to the agency for improvement. This resulted in the most recent and still inadequate habitat designation.

“We hoped this time the Service would get it right and protect inhabited lynx habitats across the West, which are essential to the species’ survival and recovery in the contiguous U.S.,” said Matthew Bishop, an attorney with the Western Environmental Law Center. “Unfortunately, the Service has yet again come up with another round of excuses for excluding important habitat from federal protection.”

Lynx habitat is under threat across the contiguous U.S., where climate change, road building, motorized recreation, and logging all pose serious threats to key habitat. The Service’s latest designation actually decreased existing protections. The Service shrunk the critical habitat by an additional 2,593 square miles from the area proposed for designation in 2013. The Service again excluded much of the cats’ historic and currently occupied last best habitat in the Rockies and Cascades from protection. In doing so, the Service improperly discounted historic records confirming lynx presence throughout these mountain ranges before excessive hunting and trapping nearly exterminated the beautiful cats from the American West.

Background

Canada lynx, medium-sized members of the feline family, are habitat and prey specialists. Heavily reliant on snowshoe hare, lynx tend to be limited in both population and distribution to areas where hare are sufficiently abundant. Like their preferred prey, lynx are specially adapted to living in mature boreal forests with dense cover and deep snowpack. The species and its habitat are threatened by climate change, logging, development, motorized access, and trapping, which disturb and fragment the landscape, increasing risks to lynx and their prey.

Studies show species with designated critical habitat under the ESA are more than twice as likely to have increasing populations than those species without. Similarly, species with adequate habitat protection are less likely to suffer declining populations and more likely to be stable. The ESA allows designation of both occupied and unoccupied habitat key to the recovery of listed species, and provides an extra layer of protection especially for animals like lynx that have an obligate relationship with a particular landscape type.

 
avatar
About The Author

Ralph Maughan

Dr. Ralph Maughan is professor emeritus of political science at Idaho State University with specialties in natural resource politics, public opinion, interest groups, political parties, voting and elections. Aside from academic publications, he is author or co-author of three hiking/backpacking guides.

5 Responses to Lawsuit: more protected habitat for threatened lynx needed

  1. avatar Yvette says:

    I mostly have questions. It appears to me that the USFWS try to avoid listing species for full protection under ESA.

    + Am I wrong? I’m sure there isn’t a simple answer. If FWS is trying to avoid listing new species then why? Politics?

    + If a species is listed as endangered I realize then being in compliance with NEPA can hold up or stop projects or development, but there probably would not be many, if any, development projects happening in Lynx habitat. Right?

    I guess I don’t understand why FWS is so reluctant to list species like lynx and wolverine.

  2. avatar Ralph Maughan says:

    Yvette,

    They have listed the lynx already — listed as “threatened.” WildEarth Guardians does not think USFWS declared enough critical habitat. There are several places of active controversy regarding state sanctioned trapping and snowmobile use.

  3. avatar Kirk Robinson says:

    If portions of the Colorado Rockies are included in lynx critical habitat, then parts of the Utah Rockies – specifically the Uinta Mountains and the Bear River Mountains – ought to be included as well, since they form an important migration route for lynx that disperse between Colorado and Wyoming.

    Of course, Utah public officials don’t want any part of the state designated critical habitat for any native species – not for sage grouse, prairie dogs, lynx or wolverine. In the case of lynx and wolverine, the worry seems to be those few old geezers who still graze their range maggots in the mountains. They see the mountains as critical habitat for their non-native maggots.

  4. avatar Leslie says:

    Here is the link to the Shoshone NF 20 year plan special meeting for objectors transcript. http://www.fs.usda.gov/detailfull/shoshone/home/?cid=stelprd3794957&width=full
    Starting on page 66 is a discussion of critical lynx habitat. The proposed FS plan seeks to have certain protected areas for lynx. This is being objected to by the Park County commissioners represented by Ecosystem Research Group [name is a misnomer]. They want more thinning in certain areas they call the ‘Matrix’. Defending the proposed lynx habitat are conservationists and the FS biologist. What follows is a very interesting discussion.

  5. avatar Leslie says:

    When you go to that link, click on the link at the top that says “Transcripts on Oct. 8 with objectors’ and it will take you to the transcript PDF

Calendar

November 2014
S M T W T F S
« Oct   Dec »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30  

Quote

‎"At some point we must draw a line across the ground of our home and our being, drive a spear into the land and say to the bulldozers, earthmovers, government and corporations, “thus far and no further.” If we do not, we shall later feel, instead of pride, the regret of Thoreau, that good but overly-bookish man, who wrote, near the end of his life, “If I repent of anything it is likely to be my good behaviour."

~ Edward Abbey

%d bloggers like this: