Editor’s note: many articles were written about this back in 2015-16. It was one of the most serious attempts in Utah, Idaho or Wyoming commonly know as “ag-gag bills,” to make it very hard for public interest groups to collect data about possible illegal practices against consumers and the environment in the agricultural sector, especially as related to farm animals, workers in that area, and environmental impacts. In a breathtaking case of overreach, Wyoming actually tried to make it illegal to collect data on public land, even including photographs.

The case is now completely over.

. . . Ralph Maughan

Court Finds the state’s Ag-Gag Laws Violate Free Speech Rights and Blocks the Statutes Permanently

 

CHEYENNE, Wyo. – Wyoming’s controversial “Data Trespass” laws are unconstitutional and violate the First Amendment, a federal district court judge ruled on Monday. Before being overturned yesterday, the law criminalized the gathering of data on public land for the purposes of reporting illegal pollution or workplace safety violations, and to add steep civil penalties for data collection. The ruling strikes down the state laws and permanently blocks them from being applied.

“The ‘data trespass’ statutes were a blatant attempt by the Wyoming legislature to block data collection on public lands and take away the public’s constitutionally guaranteed freedom of speech and freedom of expression,” said Jonathan Ratner of Western Watersheds Project. “For years, Western Watersheds Project has collected scientific data showing that the majority of streams on federal public lands are contaminated by fecal bacteria from livestock, and the legislature clearly intended to suppress that information in order to protect the livestock industry from accountability under the Clean Water Act.”

The judge agreed that the laws chilled free speech by effectively banning investigations into potential violations of environmental laws. By threatening citizens with jail time and civil penalties and singling out for heightened punishment people legally collecting environmental data on public lands, the statutes deterred people from doing their part to hold polluters, employers and corporations accountable. Such investigations in the past have led to evidence of health code, environmental and labor violations, and have improved protections for land and wildlife. “There is simply no plausible reason for the specific curtailment of speech in the statutes beyond a clear attempt to punish individuals for engaging in protected speech that at least some find unpleasant,” the judge wrote in his ruling. 

“This is a sweeping victory for the First Amendment, and a scathing rebuke of the industrial agriculture industry’s brazen attempt to hide the ways factory farms impact communities and the environment,” said David Muraskin, Food Project Attorney for Public Justice. “Wyoming’s attempt to silence and intimidate citizens, advocates and the media has now met the same demise as similar laws in Idaho and Utah, sending a clear message to industrial agriculture’s lobbyists that their dependence on secrecy to sell their product will not survive. These laws are unjust and unconstitutional, and we’ll continue to fight them from coast to coast until they have all been defeated or repealed.” 

In 2018, the Wyoming legislature passed a statute that would have added additional penalties to people exercising their free speech rights by protesting at energy facilities, posing similar Constitutional infringements, but the law was vetoed by Governor Mead. 

Wyoming’s current law provides that in order to prove trespassing, the accused person has to knowingly and intentionally cross private land, while the data trespass statue allows civil penalties and also adds criminal convictions even when the crossing of private land was accidental. The Natural Resources Defense Council cancelled a multi-year study on air pollution in Wyoming oil and gas fields as a result of the increased risk of jailtime and civil penalties. 
“The state tried to criminalize environmental advocacy,” said Michael Wall, litigation director of the Natural Resources Defense Council. “That’s un-American. And as the federal court ruled, it’s unconstitutional.” 
 
“We are very grateful to everyone at Public Justice for their extraordinary efforts in this important First Amendment case and for the other groups who joined in bringing this challenge,” said Mickey H. Osterreicher, general counsel for the National Press Photographers Association (NPPA), one of the plaintiffs. “We are also very pleased that the court recognized the chilling effect that these laws have on citizens and journalists seeking to gather information on matters of public concern and we hope that other legislatures will think long and hard before proposing and enacting constitutionally infirm statutes,” he added.
 
The Wyoming legislature passed the two data trespass statutes – one imposing jail time and one vastly increasing fines where data collection was involved – after a trespass suit brought against Western Watersheds Project by right-wing attorney Karen Budd-Falen and members the livestock industry failed because the public road used for access wasn’t marked with “no trespassing” signs. Budd-Falen is a well-known proponent of the Bundy movement to transfer control of federal public lands to local governments, and recently received a political appointment to a post in the Department of the Interior.
 
The challenge to Wyoming’s data trespass laws, which are cousins of the so-called “Ag Gag” laws in at least eight other states, was brought by a coalition of non-profit organizations, including the Western Watersheds Project, the Natural Resources Defense Council, the National Press Photographers Association. Attorneys at Public Justice and NRDC represented the plaintiffs.
 
avatar
About The Author

Ralph Maughan

Dr. Ralph Maughan is professor emeritus of political science at Idaho State University with specialties in natural resource politics, public opinion, interest groups, political parties, voting and elections. Aside from academic publications, he is author or co-author of three hiking/backpacking guides, and he is President of the Western Watersheds Project.

3 Responses to Federal Court Strikes Down Wyoming’s “Data Trespass” Laws as Unconstitutional

  1. avatar Sandy Lee says:

    The AG-Gaga laws are one of the most heinous on the books, it is good to see some of these laws are being blocked at the Federal level. I am sure the issue will not stop, but it is a step. The current administrations attack on laws and protections for both domestic and wildlife is horrific and is setting us back decades.

  2. avatar Nancy says:

    Probably good to note/know:

    “Everybody talks about finding middle ground as if the middle ground exists out there on its own,” he said. “But in the real world of politics, the middle ground is determined by the extremes.”

    https://trib.com/business/energy/controversial-wyoming-agriculture-lawyer-joins-interior-department/article_8e851010-221c-52a1-9d45-c5a8f223628c.html

    “The challenge to Wyoming’s data trespass laws, which are cousins of the so-called “Ag Gag” laws in at least eight other states, was brought by a coalition of non-profit organizations, including the Western Watersheds Project, the Natural Resources Defense Council, the National Press Photographers Association. Attorneys at Public Justice and NRDC represented the plaintiffs”

  3. avatar Isabel Cohen, Artist/Environmental Activist says:

    So glad our courts see still see things the way they should be!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Calendar

October 2018
S M T W T F S
« Sep   Nov »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Quote

‎"At some point we must draw a line across the ground of our home and our being, drive a spear into the land and say to the bulldozers, earthmovers, government and corporations, “thus far and no further.” If we do not, we shall later feel, instead of pride, the regret of Thoreau, that good but overly-bookish man, who wrote, near the end of his life, “If I repent of anything it is likely to be my good behaviour."

~ Edward Abbey

%d bloggers like this: