Reader generated wildlife news beginning on Dec. 29, 2019

It is time to create a new page of “Reader Generated Wildlife News.” Do not post copyrighted material.

Here is the link to the “old” wildlife news page that began on July 25, 2019 From there you can access links to the many older pages of wildlife news readers created.

Please post your wildlife news in the comments space below

About The Author

Ralph Maughan

Dr. Ralph Maughan is professor emeritus of political science at Idaho State University with specialties in natural resource politics, public opinion, interest groups, political parties, voting and elections. Aside from academic publications, he is author or co-author of three hiking/backpacking guides, and he is past President of the Western Watersheds Project.

37 Responses to Reader generated wildlife news. Starting on Dec. 29, 2019

  1. avatar Nancy says:

    “The infected animal was discovered in Montana’s Designated Surveillance Area, a four-county zone in southwest Montana where risk of brucellosis transmission from elk runs high”

  2. avatar idaursine says:

    oops, sorry, copied the wrong link above. I meant to post the latest on the poor Mexican gray wolves:

  3. avatar idaursine says:

    Colorado wolf reintroduction initiative qualifies for ballot. It’s shocking to me that a classic Western state does not have them, and defends not wanting them. Colorado is losing its Western character. But I just hope some nut doesn’t go on a rampage about it:

    • avatar idaursine says:

      I don’t know if I trust that anecdotal evidence, although “1” wolf has supposedly been verified by F&W.

      It doesn’t hurt to have a healthy population of formerly persecuted wildlife, because you never know when a situation will develop that might threaten a large number, such as the Australian wildfires.

      It is foolish to think people can manage wildlife populations, because they don’t really seem to be able to do a good job managing anything.

    • avatar idaursine says:

      This article has a very irresponsible alarmist tone. Anywhere there is cattle ranching, I suppose.

      I find it hard to believe they never had them. There are fossil records showing that have been in Southern Mexico and Central America for millennia:

      “Although it was once widely believed that coyotes are recent immigrants to southern Mexico and Central America, aided in their expansion by deforestation, Pleistocene and Early Holocene records, as well as records from the pre-Columbian period and early European colonization show that the animal was present in the area long before modern times.

      Nevertheless, range expansion did occur south of Costa Rica during the late 1970s and northern Panama in the early 1980s, following the expansion of cattle-grazing lands into tropical rain forests. The coyote is predicted to appear in northern Belize in the near future, as the habitat there is favorable to the species. Concerns have been raised of a possible expansion into South America through the Panamanian Isthmus, should the Darién Gap ever be closed by the Pan-American Highway.[162] This fear was partially confirmed in January 2013, when the species was recorded in eastern Panama’s Chepo District, beyond the Panama Canal.”


  4. avatar idaursine says:

    Poised to ‘invade’? I’m surprised at WaPo. As an animal defender, you really can’t count on anyone of any political stripe it seems. This is an opinion piece too, I see.

  5. avatar idaursine says:

    I should ask the experts: what defines an invasive species these days? I always thought it was one that was introduced by humans, not one that is capable of migrating, dispersing or colonizing on its own?

  6. avatar Nancy says:

    “The number of losses to grizzly bears almost doubled the losses to wolves, board Executive Director George Edwards said”

    A rancher in my valley will take the time to drag off dead livestock, often leaving it behind a bank of willows, so its not as obvious to those passing by, another rancher just leaves them lay to rot where they drop.

    We don’t have grizzles, yet, but I can only imagine the uproar when one finally does roam through and takes advantage of dead livestock laying around.

    “Cattle die for all kinds of reasons. Diseases, both known and unknown. Calves can freeze to death in the cold. Some get put down after breaking a leg. It just happens. When it does, the rancher has to do something with the body. Usually, it means piling them up somewhere”

    “Piles like this exist on ranches all over the state”

    Why do we continue to through money at these ranchers (as in livestock compensation for predation) when they are more often than not, the root cause of the problem?

  7. avatar rork says:
    Another Colorado wolf ballot measure article. The reporter lets Enstrom say whatever he wants – it’s not a journalists job to investigate whether what a person says is true (any more). There are many way over-the-top comments by extremists on both sides, which was depressing.

    • avatar Nancy says:

      I’m starting to get the feeling that trying to repopulate efficient, logical wildlife species back into what use to be their natural habitat, is really asking to much of them anymore especially when they have to tolerate, not to mention suffer through, the exploitation, ignorance and greed of mankind.

    • avatar idaursine says:

      You nailed it. Now I’m never claiming to know it all, but it really does seem that ‘it’s not a journalist’s job to investigate whether what a person says is true (any more)’.

      I did not at all appreciate the tone of the article that continues to villainize coyotes for naturally expanding their range, due to their adaptability, either.

  8. avatar JEFF E. says:

    This is what happens to a good many of those “lost pet ” ads, but with different ending…….

    • avatar Nancy says:

      Thanks for posting this Jeff E.

      Perhaps it will be a “light bulb” moment for those folks out there that think Fido or Kitty can just hang around outside, after dark, with no worries?

      Obvious Max was defending HIS territory…….

      • avatar JEFF E. says:

        god for Max he did not turn his back. would have been all over…..
        It also highlights that there are way more animals running around than is readily apparent, in the daytime……

      • avatar Hiker says:

        The other side of this story is how many birds Max has pointlessly killed in his career as an outside cat. The best part of this story is how Max is now an indoor cat. One more reason to keep pets inside.

    • avatar idaursine says:

      🙂 They don’t look like vicious coyotes to me, more like scaredy-cats!

      This is a male cat defending his turf, and I hate to say it, but it would be better if he were kept indoors? I also hope he isn’t impregnating any females out there.

    • avatar WM says:

      Ending might have been different here if Max cat had to defend more than a 180 field of view. The wall of the house helped his defense big time. Only way these 3 coyotes could get to him. One behind him and it would have been all over. Agree with Hiker it is best Max is indoors for lots of reasons.

      We now have a fast growing population of urban coyotes in the Seattle metro area, especially on the north end. Outdoor cats going missing all the time. Bunnies (which people have turned loose) in abundance, and even the occasional rodent size dog on leash or even being let out in its yard for a few minutes to take care of business are eaten with some frequency. Add to that the Norwegian brown rats from the early shipping days, feeding on untended backyard gardens in the moderate climate and the prey base is substantial. Learned all this on the Nextdoor app which neighborhoods can access (while San Francisco based capitalist data miners learn more about you).

  9. avatar idaursine says:

    Don’t get me wrong, I appreciate JEFFE’s posting this and the other article about the upcoming invasion of coyotes. 🙂

    But I find it absolutely unconscionable that people defend their so-called ‘right’ to keep pets outdoors and unneutered, despite all of the dangers to their pets, billions of birds lost and threatened due to the cumulative effect of human activities, and threats to wildlife! That is, if they are even aware of this. The woman in the video and even CNN doesn’t seem to be. Education doesn’t seem to be working.

    Can they live with the potential extinction of wildlife, and do they care or are they even aware of it?

  10. avatar idaursine says:

    I know that similar articles have been posted here about the plight of birds in modern times, but here’s a comprehensive one:

  11. avatar Immer Treue says:

    Claims are just becoming more and more bizarre.

    Are wolves partly to blame for the dairy crisis? No. Tiffany misses the mark.

    Says federal regulation of the wolf population has led to attacks on livestock, driving down production, leading to dairy farms going out of business

    “What’s more, the number of wolves in the state started to skyrocket in the early 2000s. During that time, milk production grew steadily and continues to grow — which itself is a factor in lower prices.”

  12. avatar idaursine says:

    Believe It or Not – it has made Newsweek. I hope the media is not unwitting:

    • avatar idaursine says:

      I was dismayed to read this misleading headline, because there is not one shred of proof in the actual article. Irresponsible journalism. 🙁

      People have good reason to be skeptical about any supposed sightings – we know that Gov. Hickenlooper and the CP&W both opposed reintroduction of gray and Mexican gray wolves:

      Ranchers and hunters have pursued a vendetta against wolves for centuries, and we know of the notorious hunters who can’t tell the difference between a wolf and a coyote, whether by intention or not. The article only says ‘wild canid’.

      So now the people have spoken. A healthy environment with its full complement of wildlife should be at least as important and legalizing recreational marijuana, don’t you agree?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


December 2019
« Nov   Jan »


‎"At some point we must draw a line across the ground of our home and our being, drive a spear into the land and say to the bulldozers, earthmovers, government and corporations, “thus far and no further.” If we do not, we shall later feel, instead of pride, the regret of Thoreau, that good but overly-bookish man, who wrote, near the end of his life, “If I repent of anything it is likely to be my good behaviour."

~ Edward Abbey

%d bloggers like this: