Erik Molvar and Marsha Small. (Author bios below)

By Erik Molvar and Marsha Small

As America struggles with its history of systemic racism, the environmental movement faces questions of its own over the extent to which policies that were racist, genocidal, or entailed ethnic cleansing played a role in early American conservation. Much of the western United States is federal public land, but all of the United States was once Indigenous land, much of it continuously occupied for as much as 24,000 years. The lands that became our nation – public and private alike – were cleared of their Native inhabitants through warfare, genocide, and removal. 

Early conservation figures often reflected the racist views of their times. In most cases, lands protected for environmental conservation gained official designation long after their Indigenous inhabitants were exterminated or deported to reservations. Nonetheless, all of these lands were occupied at one time or another, sometimes continuously, by Indigenous cultures. 

Today’s environmentalists are wisest when we approach this issue with humility, recognizing the original inhabitants’ relationship with the land, so much more mutualistic and environmentally sustainable than our own. Certainly, Indigenous peoples set fires to improve hunting and habitat for game species, and in some North American regions even engaged in intensive crop farming and (here I include present-day Mexico) built complex cities. Overall, the native ecosystems and the biodiversity of native life that existed, for example, when the Lewis and Clark expedition crossed the Northern Plains, was far more diverse and abundant than anything we have seen since. With EuroAmerican settlers came market hunting, single-crop farming on a vast scale, deforestation, fires far beyond what the land had heretofore seen, predator extermination programs, fencing of open lands, acid mine drainage, invasive weeds, wagon roads, railroads and ultimately highways, and later powerlines and oilfields and strip mines. It was environmental devastation and extinction on a continent-wide scale, and the best efforts of environmentalists over the past two centuries have thus far succeeded in protecting or restoring only a tiny fraction in a relatively natural state.

The treaties emplaced, typically during the late stages of these campaigns against Indigenous peoples, to relegate them to reservations and cede the best and most productive lands to white settlers, were systematically violated by the federal government. Reserved lands were encroached upon, further invaded, or taken away. Promised annuities of foodstuffs were often of inferior (even worthless) quality, or purloined by unscrupulous Indian Agents. Reservation lands were forcibly allotted to impoverished tribal individuals so they could be sold to whites, and tribal mineral interests were mismanaged such that immense sums of royalty payments were withheld. Tribes lacking treaties were deprived of both lands and rights, and sometimes “terminated,” losing federal recognition. These widespread violations of treaty agreements by the dominant culture reduced the legal process of cession of Indigenous lands to a swindle.

“Genocide” officially means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group: Killing members of the group; causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; and/or forcibly transferring children of the group to another group. There can be no doubt that Indigenous peoples in North America were subjected to genocide by the United States government and its citizens, with repeated appalling incidents including the following:

  • The 1856-1859 Round Valley Massacres in California, in which white settlers staged unprovoked attacks against the Yuki inhabitants of Round Valley in present-day Mendocino County, including abductions into slavery, extirpating the entire tribe of 16,000-20,000 people. The attacks came after the California Governor called in 1851 for a “war of extermination” until “the Indian race becomes extinct.” The State of California recently officially recognized these events as genocide, and offered apologies.
  • The 1863 Bear River Massacre, in which a militia staged a January attack against a starving camp of Shoshone in Idaho’s Cache Valley, killing as many as 493 people. 
  • The 1864 Sand Creek Massacre, in which a Colorado militia led by John Chivington surprised at dawn a peaceful camp of Cheyenne and Arapaho, attacking them in their tipis and slaughtering most of the entire group. They were flying a white flag of truce, showing they were there by executive agreement. The militia gutted pregnant women and smashed the baby’s heads, cut the testicles off some of the men and the breasts off of women, and used them as saddle decorations. 
  • The 1868 “Battle of the Washita,” in which the U.S. 7th Cavalry attacked the camp of Cheyenne, Arapaho, and Lakota led by Black Kettle, while they traveled to a reservation.
  • The 1870 Marias Massacre, in which the U.S. 2nd Cavalry attacked a camp of Piegans led by Heavy Runner, who was considered peaceful and carrying an official letter of safe conduct from the U.S. government. The Indigenous camp on Montana’s Marias River was attacked while asleep, and an estimated 200 men, women, and children were killed.
  • The 1890 “Battle” of Wounded Knee (more properly termed the Wounded Knee Massacre), in which U.S. 7th Cavalry attacked, without provocation, a band of peaceful Lakotahs as they traveled across their own Pine Ridge Reservation. The Cavalry surrounded and annihilated the band, killing at least 250 men, women, and children. 

Don’t doubt it, genocide took place right here on American soil, and our federal and state governments were the prime perpetrators. Under today’s international law, many – if not all – of these events would properly be recognized as war crimes. They are representative of a deeply shameful period of American history, the legacy of which still haunts our nation.

In addition to genocide, the United States government pursued a policy of ethnic cleansing, featuring the removal of Indigenous peoples from their native lands, relegating them to reservations (which in early years they were not permitted to leave), removing their children by force from families and transporting them to boarding schools to be re-educated in white cultural norms (forcibly stripped of their long hair and native dress, and punished, often savagely, for using their native language), but most important, removing them from their lands which identified them, on which their very language is based. President Ulysses S Grant engaged in a purposeful campaign to eradicate bison from the West, to subdue Indigenous peoples by destroying their main supply of food, hides, and other lifeways. As Henry Kissinger would put it a century later, “Who controls the food supply controls the people.”

During this period of American history, racism and discrimination was not just tolerated, but an officially sanctioned policy, and a pervasive and socially dominant element of American culture. Indigenous peoples were treated as subhuman, and official correspondence of the period by politicians and military leaders of the time refers to the original Americans in these terms. Racism against Indigenous peoples continues to this day, and is disturbingly pervasive across the American West. Western Watersheds Project condemns racism in all its forms, and in particular against the peoples who have the only legitimate claim to being “Natives.”

Racism, including against Indigenous peoples, was sometimes openly expressed by early icons of the conservation movement. Offenders now recognized to be racist include John Muir, John James Audubon, Madison Grant, and William Temple Hornaday. In fact, it is difficult to find a prominent 19th Century conservation figure without some overt link to racism. It is hard to learn that the heroes of your movement had major character flaws. Whether or not environmentalism is inherently racist, however, is a choice to be decided today – and each day – by the ever-evolving environmental movement. And that movement is increasingly moving toward admission and reparations.

Apologists for the American policy of “Manifest Destiny,” the conquest of the North American continent by peoples of European descent, typically ignore the fact that Indigenous peoples had thriving subsistence economies and rich cultures and civilizations long before the first Anglo-American set foot on this continent. Environmentalism was more than a credo to the Original Peoples, it was a sacred imperative, and sustainability was a way of life. Today, Natives retain environmental leanings, and in a January 2021 poll, Indigenous respondents scored higher than whites on environmental values for practically every environmental issue. 

Indigenous peoples are natural allies to environmental conservationists, and they prove it every day. Indigenous leaders are at the forefront of many of today’s biggest environmental fights: Standing Rock and the Dakota Access Pipeline, Arctic drilling, the Pebble Mine, Oak Flat, and Bears Ears National Monument, to name a few. And with the nation’s first Indigenous Secretary of Interior, Native leadership in environmental issues is poised to vault to center stage.

Western Watersheds Project is an environmental conservation group. Founded in 1993, our organization was not there to witness the early years of EuroAmerican colonization of the West. Like EuroAmericans in general, we’re latecomers, even though we’ve been here a while. It makes sense for us to reach out to potential allies among Indigenous communities, to advance our common interests when our goals align with each other. We’d like to be on our best behavior, to not only atone for the racism that came before, but to find cohesive and correlative remedies, a horizon of equity. Through our work, we aim to honor the cultural heritage of the Original Peoples, respect the sovereignty and treaty rights of Tribes, and work together with Indigenous peoples for a more environmentally sustainable future.

 

Erik Molvar is Executive Director of Western Watersheds Project, a nonprofict environmental conservation group dedicated to protecting and restoring wildlife and watersheds throughout the American West.

Marsha Small (Tsistsistah (Northern Cheyenne)) advises against mentions of the words “white” and “black”, saying that even naming skin colors reinforces colonialist divisions and barriers between people.

 

 
avatar
About The Author

Erik Molvar

24 Responses to Of Indigenous Peoples, Environmentalism, and Atonement

  1. avatar Kirk Robinson says:

    Well done! I live on the lands of the Ute, Shoshone, Piute and Goshute nations. Growing up I was told that the Mormon people and their leader, Brigham Young, were kind to the native people, but I have learned since that this was not true in many instances. For example, its hard to believe that Young didn’t play a role in bringing about the Bear River Massacre, led by Colonel Patrick Connor of Fort Douglas in the NE Salt Lake Valley. I didn’t even hear about this early massacre until I was an adult. Wikipedia has a good entry on it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bear_River_Massacre

  2. avatar Robert Raven says:

    Excellent article. America’s original sin (along with slavery) is the genocide of Indigenous Americans, and the violation of human rights and countless treaties. We must have truth, reconciliation, remediation, and reparations!

  3. avatar Ida Lupine says:

    The time frame in which it all so quickly took place is stunning to me, as well. A few hundred years to almost destroy what had taken many thousands to build – people, land and wildlife.

  4. avatar Mark L says:

    I think one the best forms of atonement that’s possible is to keep federal lands out of private hands, when (inevitably) one generation or another sees itself as knowing ‘what is the best use’ of the land and its inhabitants. Unfortunately even our legal system is slowly corrupted by thieves and prostitutes of all kinds. The real reward would be a government that means well and keeps its word…..is there such a thing?

  5. avatar Beeline says:

    “….As a nation we need to heal and we’re not going to be able to do that until the Natives are healed”. Marsha Small, quote from the Billings Gazette.

    I agree. But this nation does know how to heal. It still propagates violence and hypocrisy and in the midst of such stressful times our leaders in the federal government throw us a few crumbs to appease us. Perhaps this country has been in a cycle of abuse for so long it cannot recover.

    I looked back into my own ancestry which is primarily Celtic. My ancient ancestors in Gaul and Wales lived much like indigenous people of the Americas did until the Roman invasion over 2000 years ago. The Romans killed off Celt leaders, teachers and holy people and destroyed Celtic sacred sites and butchered wild animals. Sound familiar? Resources were appropriated by the wealthy Roman “houses” (corporations of the time) and the Roman empire spread through colonization to much of Europe and Eurasia. Cornelius Tacitus remarked that “where they (the Roman Army) make a desert, they call it peace”. There was nothing great or peaceful about it as is the case in the Middle East today.

    The next phase of repression saw the wealthy hierarchy that kept regenerating itself at the expense of the common people, brand some of my Welsh ancestors as heretics and traitors for musical and theatrical performances in public. Later on in the last couple hundred years Welsh school children were punished, intimidated and beaten for speaking their own ancient language rather than English. The Welsh people were told that they would fail miserably unless they made the English language their “regulation” language. But the Welsh people decided to speak their own language anyway and they did not fail. Quite the contrary.

    We really need to have the hierarchy in America admit to the atrocities of the past and likewise give up the Roman paradigm of damaging, conquering, and repressing other cultures and ecosystems if healing is to happen.

    The U.S. Army could start by ceremonially removing the 14 campaign ribbons for the so called battles fought against Native American tribes from 1790 to 1890 from its own formal battle flag. We know now that the U.S.military engaged in the outright slaughter of Indigenous peoples. If the U.S. government cannot give up these symbols of inhumanity then it will fall into a downward and irreversible spiral of dysfunction as did the Romans.

    • avatar Robert Raven says:

      I agree, there has been conquests and atrocities throughout history. My family is Irish and Jewish.
      But I live on Coast Miwok land, so their history of genocide and stolen land should also be honored by me.

  6. avatar Nancy says:

    Something to think about? I’m guessing many people who weigh in on this site, expecting answers or direction? might give this some thought:

    • avatar Maggie Frazier says:

      Thank you so much, Nancy – best talk of any kind I’ve heard in a long time! Will post this on Letters from an American!

  7. avatar JEFF E. says:

    Might I suggest the text LIES MY TEACHER TOLD ME by James W. Loewen

    Chap. 4: “Historically, American Indians are the most lied about subset of our population”

  8. avatar Marc Bedner says:

    All land in the USA, public or private, is stolen land. Anglo-Americans stole land from the Spanish whose ancestors stole land from “indigenous” peoples whose ancestors stole land from indigenous wildlife. Now it has become fashionable to look at “indigenous” practices of burning forests to increase hunting opportunities as an example of ecological management of forests and wildlife habitat.

    Deb Haaland, the first “indigenous” Secretary of the Interior, recently redefined National Public Lands Day as National Hunting and Fishing Day. From a humanist perspective “native” game departments have the same right to open their land to hunters as state game departments, but this does not help wildlife.

    Regardng Sierra Club slanders of John Muir, see https://www.earthisland.org/journal/index.php/articles/entry/who-was-john-muir-really/

  9. avatar Ida Lupine says:

    More info:

    https://madison.com/wsj/news/local/environment/tribes-ask-federal-court-to-halt-november-wolf-hunt-claim-direct-assault-on-treaty-rights/article_f2dcf530-ccda-5f32-98c6-6674abeeb625.html

    I don’t see how the state can have basically two hunts in 2021, especially where they so flagrantly went over and above the quotas for the states and the Native Americans, and plan to do so again, with 300 wolves to be killed.

Leave a Reply to Kirk Robinson Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Calendar

September 2021
S M T W T F S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Quote

‎"At some point we must draw a line across the ground of our home and our being, drive a spear into the land and say to the bulldozers, earthmovers, government and corporations, “thus far and no further.” If we do not, we shall later feel, instead of pride, the regret of Thoreau, that good but overly-bookish man, who wrote, near the end of his life, “If I repent of anything it is likely to be my good behaviour."

~ Edward Abbey

%d bloggers like this: