Resort on the face of Bitterroot Range is turned down again
By Ralph Maughan On July 5, 2008 · 5 Comments · In Forest Service, Land Development, Public Lands, Wildlife Habitat
Bitterroot Resort’s latest proposal rejected. By Perry Backus. Ravalli Republic
Good!
Tagged with: Bitterroot Resort

Ralph Maughan
Dr. Ralph Maughan is professor emeritus of political science at Idaho State University with specialties in natural resource politics, public opinion, interest groups, political parties, voting and elections. Aside from academic publications, he is author or co-author of three hiking/backpacking guides, and he is past President of the Western Watersheds Project.
5 Responses to Resort on the face of Bitterroot Range is turned down again
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Recent Posts
- South Plateau Timber Sale Another FS Con Job February 24, 2021
- Malheur Collaborative Bent On Degrading Forest Ecosystems February 22, 2021
- Predicted habitat availability does not address recovery success for Mexico’s Mexican wolves February 8, 2021
- Critique of The West Is Burning Documentary February 5, 2021
- Yellowstone and Native American History February 2, 2021
Recent Comments
- Ida Lupine on South Plateau Timber Sale Another FS Con Job
- Beeline on South Plateau Timber Sale Another FS Con Job
- Ida Lupine on Reader generated wildlife news.
- Ida Lupine on Reader generated wildlife news.
- Ralph Maughan on Reader generated wildlife news.
- tim on Reader generated wildlife news.
- Ida Lupine on Reader generated wildlife news.
- Ida Lupine on Reader generated wildlife news.
- Ida Lupine on Reader generated wildlife news.
- JEFF E. on Reader generated wildlife news.
- Ida Lupine on Reader generated wildlife news.
- Ida Lupine on Reader generated wildlife news.
- Ed Loosli on Reader generated wildlife news.
- Ida Lupine on Reader generated wildlife news.
- Ida Lupine on Reader generated wildlife news.
As someone who loves to ski, I don’t see any real need for another resort here. There is already Lookout Pass in the same vicinity as well as Silver mountain a little further west in Idaho. A large portion of the usage at the above come from the greater Spokane area, which already has 7 ski areas within about two hours. They should just leave this as a wilderness.
It sounds to me like it is really just a way to sell mountain real estate, something Montana and the United States doesn’t need more of.
maybe these people need to look into eco tourism. no trace, profitable too
From the article it sounds like if the applicants address some lynx issues all is a roll. Very disappointing for someone like me who is trying to raise my kid in a nearby town where it is harder and harder for regular folk to own any piece of property, however small and austere. A big resort just S of Missoula would make it even harder for our town to stay “small town, working class”. And I think that’s a damn shame.
Here is one more reason to add to the list as why this is a bad idea here in Idaho. We can only assume this resort if built will suffer a similar fate.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121539589279431523.html?mod=googlenews_wsj