Idaho Statesman: A last-minute rewrite of Endangered Species Act regulations is rash and futile
A last-minute rewrite of Endangered Species Act regulations is rash and futile. Editorial by the Idaho Statesman.
This rewrite, or gutting of the Act, is going to disappear if the right candidate wins the presidency.
Tagged with: Kempthorne

Ralph Maughan
Dr. Ralph Maughan is professor emeritus of political science at Idaho State University with specialties in natural resource politics, public opinion, interest groups, political parties, voting and elections. Aside from academic publications, he is author or co-author of three hiking/backpacking guides, and he is past President of the Western Watersheds Project.
2 Responses to Idaho Statesman: A last-minute rewrite of Endangered Species Act regulations is rash and futile
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Recent Posts
- Bozeman Watershed Project Based on Flawed Assumptions April 7, 2021
- Livestock Influence On Soil Carbon Storage April 6, 2021
- Mexican wolf depredation investigations …. again April 5, 2021
- Antidote For Rural Sprawl–Land Use Zoning April 1, 2021
- The 99-Year Old Grandmother Argument–The Bias of Forestry Advocates March 30, 2021
Recent Comments
- Ida Lupine on Reader generated wildlife news.
- Hiker on Reader generated wildlife news.
- Ed Loosli on Reader generated wildlife news.
- Nancy on Reader generated wildlife news.
- STG on Bozeman Watershed Project Based on Flawed Assumptions
- Rich on Mexican wolf depredation investigations …. again
- Tamara Bedic on Mexican wolf depredation investigations …. again
- Ed Loosli on Reader generated wildlife news.
- Ida Lupine on Reader generated wildlife news.
- Ida Lupine on Reader generated wildlife news.
- Ida Lupine on Reader generated wildlife news.
- Nancy on Reader generated wildlife news.
- Beeline on Livestock Influence On Soil Carbon Storage
- David Hoefer on Domestic Sheep Threaten Wild Bighorns
- Charles Jennings on Domestic Sheep Threaten Wild Bighorns
One huge difference between Clinton’s roadless rule and this attempt to gut the ESA by rule making is that Clinton’s roadless revision involved dozens of public meetings (I drove 100 miles in a downpour to attend one.), a lengthy public comment process, etc. ” Bush’s rulemaking is (so far, at least) subject only to a 30 day comment period.
In Idaho the county commissioners did hold a number of meetings on the issue and then they sent their comments to Governor Risch. I don’t know if they listened to the comments of their county residents.
I did testify at the one in Pocatello.