Savory BS – The Contagious Fairytale Disease

Some years back one supposed expert named Allan Savory did a TED Talk [the ultra-processed McDonald’s of information] claiming that he was able to make deserts verdant and reverse climate change through livestock grazing.

His absurd claims racked up nearly 6 million views and was enthusiastically welcomed by both livestock industry supporters and people who don’t know much about basic ecology of arid systems.

People desperately wanted to believe the myth that they can have their meat and green the deserts and reverse global warming all at the same time.

I am sure you have seen this photo from his TED Talk

Savory’s magical thinking has pervaded the discussion on livestock in the arid west as well as elsewhere around the world ever since.

As one could have expected from such fanciful claims, there is a vast separation between the theory and reality.

I expect you may be one of the millions who watched the TED Talk or who has heard about it.

A few years after the TED Talk, I and a few other authors published a response to the Savory myth. We looked at Savory’s claims in light of the scientific literature and found nothing to support his claims. While we looked at the questions from the perspective of the western US, we couldn’t even find support within the literature from his native South Africa.

If you are one of those millions who got infected by the Savory myth, I would urge you to read our paper.

Other authors have reviewed Savory’s claims, a few are provided below for further reading:

Maybe I am a dinosaur, out of sync with the new tick-tok fiction, alternative, manufactured reality but I think in today’s world as we rush towards a fact-free world where reality is being usurped by ‘perception’ [i.e. make-believe] we need to push back against fact-free living.

You can only ignore reality for so long before reality does you in because you ignored it.

A few more links:

https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/11/05/cows-on-the-run-debunking-myths-about-livestock-grazing-and-carbon-storage


Posted

in

,

by

Comments

  1. GarryRogers Avatar

    BS indeed. And coming upon it by killing 30,000 elephants–grotesque.

  2. Jeff Hoffman Avatar
    Jeff Hoffman

    As soon as I started getting hit with the Savory BS in response to my advocacy of removing cattle, I contacted a friend at the Center for Biological Diversity and asked him if the science on this matter had changed. He assured me that it had not. I knew right then & there that Savory was full of it.

    Savory is a rancher and thus has an obvious conflict of interests here. As my father taught me when I was very young, if you want to know what’s going on, always follow the money. As Upton Sinclair said, it’s difficult to impossible to convince someone that what they do is harmful if their living depends on doing it, reality notwithstanding.

    1. Wayne Tyson Avatar
      Wayne Tyson

      I didn’t even get through the Introduction to the assessment paper before foaming at the mouth. To put my notes in context, here is some of my markup text (unfortunately my red text doesn’t translate to WordPress’s so I have used double [[ ]] quotes to separate my annotations:

      “However, we find the authors’ endorsement of HM dis-
      concerting given that only minimal qualitative data is presented in
      support of this policy recommendation. Further, their endorsement
      is based largely on the purported benefits of intensive rotational
      grazing (IRG), a grazing strategy that is widely advocated by HM,
      without either investigation or an assessment of the evidence asso-
      ciated with this grazing strategy. [[GREENHOGWASH!]]

      “We wish to comment on the evidence addressing HM, and especially IRG, in a more comprehensive and systematic manner to clearly identify the extent to which a policy endorsement of HM and the purported benefits of IRG have been overstated by Sherren et al. (2012). Intensive rotational grazing (syn. cell grazing and time controlled grazing) involves the subdivision of individual
      paddocks into multiple units – often eight or more – that are grazed successively with a single herd or flock of animals to produce short [[How short? Condition of “forage” and associated species, pre- and post-period soil water quantity and quality?]], intensive periods of grazing followed by longer periods [[How long? Biomass numbers?]] of deferment (Heitschmidt and Taylor, 1991). Successive periods of grazing by livestock concentrated in a single pasture to produce a high grazing pressure (animal demand per forage availability) followed by rest periods – when supported by adaptive management as prescribed by HM – are assumed to provide the ecological benefits attributed by the authors to IRG. We acknowledge that IRG represents one of many viable grazing strategies (Briske et al., 2008; Tanaka et al., 2011), but insufficient evidence exists to support the occurrence of consistent ecological benefits relative to other less intensive grazing strategies. [[Trampling effects?]]

  3. Wayne Tyson Avatar
    Wayne Tyson

    Beware of the yellow-bellied grantsnatcher too!

Leave a Reply

Author
Jonathan Ratner

Jonathan Ratner has been in the trenches of public lands conservation for nearly 25 years. He started out doing forest carnivore work for the Forest Service, BLM, and the Inter-agency Grizzly Bear Study Team, with some Wilderness Rangering on the Pinedale Ranger District. That work lead him directly to deal with the gross corruption within the federal agencies' range program.

Subscribe to get new posts right in your Inbox

Jonathan Ratner
×