The powerful livestock organization R-CALF has written to the U.S. Secretary of Agriculture urging that a program be implemented to rid the Greater Yellowstone area of brucellosis. This includes Yellowstone Park. The means they suggest for doing this are draconian.

According to a story today by Brodie Farquhar in the Casper Star Tribune they include:

  • Mandate brucellosis testing of bison in the Yellowstone ecosystem.
  • Work toward eradication of brucellosis in Yellowstone bison by multiple means, including but not limited to trapping, testing and vaccinating bison in that area.
  • Work with the National Park Service and USDA Wildlife Services to control the size of bison and elk herds in the Yellowstone ecosystem.
  • Continue brucellosis testing, vaccination and surveillance where it already occurs and implement surveillance in all states where cattle are present.
  • Maintain a national brucellosis surveillance/vaccination program for livestock disease traceback purposes.
  • Redirect funding for an animal ID program to pay for ongoing and existing brucellosis surveillance/vaccination programs.

Brucellosis is a non-native disease that used to infect many cattle in the United States. It was passed to Yellowstone Park bison in the early 1900s by cattle brought into the Park to supply milk. Since then the bison passed the disease to elk.

While an unknown percentage of Park bison and elk are infected and are infectious, the bulk of the infection has long since moved south to Wyoming where it is perpetuated by the numerous winter feedlots for elk that are operated by Wyoming Game and Fish and also the federal government’s National Elk Refuge at Jackson, Wyoming.

Wyoming elk have since passed the disease back to cattle in both Wyoming and borderline cattle in Idaho, causing both states to lose their “brucellosis free status,” although both states have since regained that status. Much is made of this status, but it appears to be primarily a political measure designed to secure objectives of the livestock industry.

When Wyoming lost its brucellosis free status, the governor convened a panel that recommended that instead of closing the feedlots, a “test and slaughter” program for elk be set up. It began last winter near Pinedale, Wyoming at the Muddy Creek feedground. When Idaho lost its brucellosis free status, the Idaho media barely covered the event, most likely because the livestock industry could find few political objectives it could accomplish in Idaho.

Brucellosis can be passed to humans where is causes undulant fever, a hard to cure bacterial disease. It is very difficult for humans get get brucellosis unless they drink unpasteurized milk from infected livestock or acquire get it in veterinary accidents. Most cases in the U.S. today are among immigrants who get it from drinking unpasteurized goat milk.

Montana has been most aggressive in preventing the spread of the disease. Montana does this by keeping bison strictly confined to Yellowstone Park, although it ignores brucellosis in elk, the most likely source of wildife-to-cattle infection. The incidence of brucellosis in Montana elk is low, however, because Montana does not feed elk. Montana has been long criticized for its handling of bison because it is not clear how the bison could give the disease to Montana cattle because all but a few private cattle behind fences have been removed from the area around the Park.

Beside keeping bison confined to Yellowstone Park, the only measures being actively taken, until Wyoming’s “experimental” test-and-slaughter experiment, has been vaccinating cattle and elk against brucellosis. Vaccinating cattle is relatively effective, but Wyoming’s long term program vaccinating elk has had little or no discernible effect. Scientists are trying to develop a vaccine that is more effective with both elk and bison.

Conservationists have strongly urged letting Yellowstone’s bison roam unmolested in cattle-free areas adjacent to Yellowstone and have Wyoming close down its elk feedlots which perpetuate the disease, rather than testing and killing elk. A number of lawsuits are underway and the Buffalo Field Campaign has for years tried to stop Montana from slaughtering the bison that leave Yellowstone Park in the winter, instead urging Montana to give habitat to the bison in the cattle-free zone outside the Park.

In Wyoming, some sportsmen who fear the loss of elk numbers to starvation, have strongly supported keeping the feedlots, even urging that elk be fed more. An example was the recent “hay day” at Jackson. Story in the Jackson Hole News and Guide. The National Elk Refuge has abandoned the feeding of hay and opted for alfalfa pellets because they are more efficiently spread to feed elk and they tend to concentrate the elk less than the hay. Sportsman for Fish and Wildlife – Wyoming has been the sportsman group in favor of continued feeding, with other groups non-committal or strongly in favor of restoring natural winter range for elk in Wyoming, but that proposal again runs into livestock industry opposition.

Because Wyoming politics seems to bring effective action on the issue to an impasse, it has been suggested that the state’s strong antagonism to wolves is being used as a diversion tactic to keep elk supporters divided and ineffective, grouping them into “feeders” and “natural winter range” advocates, and “pro-wolf” and “anti-wolf.”

Meanwhile the actions of R-CALF and the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s agency APHIS (the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service) indicate that the livestock industry is trying to make and end run around everyone to try to take control of wildlife in Yellowstone Park and in the states too. Wyoming’s Governor Dave Freudenthal, who has been an anti-wolf, “feeder,” may be belatedly waking up to the threat of APHIS, see “[Wyoming] Gov blasts federal brucellosis proposal.

Whether it is a federal plan or a state plan to test and slaughter elk or bison, there is little evidence that this is an effective route in reducing brucellosis because the testing is inaccurate. Elk and bison who test “positive” for the disease may or may not have the disease. The presence of antibodies to the infection only means they have been exposed to it, much like a person who has had influenza or another infectious disease and recovered. The actual bacteria can be cultured by a slow and expensive effort that is not suitable for a test and slaughter program. Not only are there a lot of “false positives,” there are “false negatives” who have active disease and slip through test-and-slaughter. These are most likely recently infected elk.

The only proven method to keep brucellosis out of cattle from livestock is to prevent unnatural, and perhaps some natural, winter concentrations of bison and elk, and to vaccinate cattle or keep them away from bison and, particularly, elk. The former is done but not the latter because elk are a valuable big games species. Bison hunting has not developed due to a variety of political complications mostly related to their primary residence in national parks — Yellowstone and Grand Teton.

I have written hundreds of articles on this issue and the only constant I can find is the livestock industry and its set of values that is incompatible with both wildife and the philosophy of national parks. This is summed up by the statement by Dennis McDonald, immediate past-president of the Montana Cattlemen’s Association and now representing Region I (Montana, Idaho, Washington and Oregon) on the R-CALF board of directors: “I view Yellowstone as a large ranch.”

The wintertime hazing and slaughter of bison by the Montana Department of Livestock in the cow-free area just west of Yellowstone Park seems to be irritating more and more residents of the area who fear for their safety and their property-rights.

I concluded several years ago that real factor behind all of this is not disease, but a values conflict between the livestock industry who wants to gain control of wildlife and exert its cultural dominance over residents of Montana and Wyoming, and the rest of the population who are poorly organized and confused by the various contradictory narratives (stories justifying policies) spun out by livestock bureaucrats, conservationists, politicians, some sportsman groups. These stories are about wildlife, starvation, disease, wolves, states rights, and hunting.

They generally miss the mark. The cattle industry is behind all of it.

Brucellosis today is a real infection, but its ultimate cause and effects are political, not biological.

 
avatar
About The Author

Ralph Maughan

Dr. Ralph Maughan is professor emeritus of political science at Idaho State University with specialties in natural resource politics, public opinion, interest groups, political parties, voting and elections. Aside from academic publications, he is author or co-author of three hiking/backpacking guides, and he is President of the Western Watersheds Project.

5 Responses to The Ranchers-Cattlemen Action Legal Fund wants to kill thousands of Yellowstone area bison and elk

  1. avatar Pronghorn says:

    “I view Yellowstone as a large ranch,” said Dennis McDonald, immediate past-president of the Montana Cattlemen’s Association (MCA) and currently representing Region I (Montana, Idaho, Washington and Oregon) on the R-CALF board of directors.

    He is also chairman of the Democratic party in MT. Montana Democrats–those who care about native wildlife, about an honest (rather than political) application of science, about ecosystem integrity–should contact Gov. Schweitzer and tell him the party no longer has their support and not one more dime in political contributions until McDonald is replaced as party chairman. His brand of extremism doesn’t belong in the Democratic pary — not even in Montana. Yellowstone as ranch, or Yellowstone as wild, intact ecosystem. Which will we choose?

  2. Thanks for the post! Democratic Party chair likes to think of Yellowstone as a big ranch! Well well.

    However, I did do a little further checking. This guy did resign as Montana Democratic Party chair last March.

  3. avatar kt says:

    Yes, the cattle industry is behind all of it. What is the econimc value of the cattle in the area where this government-sponsored harassment and killing of native wildlife is taking place? Basically, nothing. And we all are likely subsidizing any cow in the area to the tune of hundreds if not thousands of dollars a head.

    One thing that keeps propping up this horribly destructive, greedy industry that is destroying much of the West is that it has built up a fauning coterie of state (Ag. agents, “range” staff at land grant colleges) and federal government employees (such as APHIS Wildlife Services) whose main reason for being is accommodating the Cattlemen’s every whine.

    Not to mention the fact that the primary function of the staff at most BLM and Forest offices is to futilely try to mitigate the damage to streams, water pollution, weeds and desertification the Cattlemen are causing on OUR public lands.

    I wonder what the ratio of Cattlemen to “support” personnel is out there? Each hobby rancher, absentee owner, grazing LLC , or good ‘ol boy Cowman is likely supported by several taxpayer-funded sycophants.

    When I’ve seen the Buffalo Field Campaign videos of the insanity occurring around Yellowstone, it looks like a small army of snowmobiling thugs has been let loose on the land. Bush wants a troop “surge’ in Iraq? Send DOL and APHIS.

  4. avatar Pronghorn says:

    Ralph, regarding McDonald’s resignation, I did find a story in the 3/23 Helena Independent Record where he announced his resignation, but the governor had this to say:

    Schweitzer, reached at the governor’s mansion Thursday night, said McDonald has done a ‘‘better job than ever,’’ and his resignation probably won’t stick.

    ‘‘I doubt that he is resigning,’’ Schweitzer said. ‘‘It is a noble goal (to fill all the slots), but I do not believe he is quitting.

    ‘‘He’s a little bummed out, but by tomorrow I can almost guarantee that he’ll be chairman. He’ll be 100 percent on board. I’m proud of him.’’
    http://www.helenair.com/articles/2006/03/24/montana/a08032406_01.txt

    Then, I located a Dem party news release dated 5/10 where he is cited as party chair. Methinks he is still with us….at least I can find no other reference to anyone else filling the position.

    http://www.montanademocrats.org/news/pressroom/Burns%20Urged%20to%20Follow%20White%20House%20Example.pdf

  5. avatar Brad Hall says:

    Ralph,
    Dennis McDonald is listed as chair of the Montana Democratic Party
    on their website.

    http://www.montanademocrats.org/contacts/staff.html

Calendar

December 2006
S M T W T F S
« Nov   Jan »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  

Quote

‎"At some point we must draw a line across the ground of our home and our being, drive a spear into the land and say to the bulldozers, earthmovers, government and corporations, “thus far and no further.” If we do not, we shall later feel, instead of pride, the regret of Thoreau, that good but overly-bookish man, who wrote, near the end of his life, “If I repent of anything it is likely to be my good behaviour."

~ Edward Abbey

%d bloggers like this: