Much-debated stream access bill in Montana is tabled
Much like the proposals to regulate or eliminate elk shooting enclosures in Idaho, which had much public support, but were defeated anyway, efforts in Montana to secure the right to access the streams of the state, which belong to the people, has been killed in the Montana legislature.
Much-debated stream access bill tabled. By Charles S. Johnson. Billings Gazette State Bureau

Ralph Maughan
Dr. Ralph Maughan is professor emeritus of political science at Idaho State University. He has been a Western Watersheds Project Board Member off and on for many years, and also its President. For many years he produced Ralph Maughan's Wolf Report. He was a founder of the Greater Yellowstone Coalition. He and Jackie Johnson Maughan wrote three editions of "Hiking Idaho." He also wrote "Beyond the Tetons" and "Backpacking Wyoming's Teton and Washakie Wilderness." He created and is the administrator of The Wildlife News.
2 Responses to Much-debated stream access bill in Montana is tabled
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Recent Posts
- BLM Fails To Protect Public Patrimony Through Renewal of Grazing Privileges Without Environmental Review May 17, 2022
- Conservation Groups Threaten To Sue On East Paradise Grazing Decision May 12, 2022
- Gratitude for National Parks May 11, 2022
- Jimmy Carter Supports Protection of Izembek NWR Wilderness May 10, 2022
- Good News–Grazing Allotments to Remain Closed on Bridgeport Ranger District May 4, 2022
Recent Comments
- Ida Lupine on BLM Fails To Protect Public Patrimony Through Renewal of Grazing Privileges Without Environmental Review
- Ida Lupine on BLM Fails To Protect Public Patrimony Through Renewal of Grazing Privileges Without Environmental Review
- Laurie on BLM Fails To Protect Public Patrimony Through Renewal of Grazing Privileges Without Environmental Review
- Charles Fox on BLM Fails To Protect Public Patrimony Through Renewal of Grazing Privileges Without Environmental Review
- Maggie Frazier on BLM Fails To Protect Public Patrimony Through Renewal of Grazing Privileges Without Environmental Review
- Ida Lupine on Gratitude for National Parks
- Hiker on Gratitude for National Parks
- Hiker on Gratitude for National Parks
- Mark L on Gratitude for National Parks
- Hiker on Gratitude for National Parks
- Hiker on Gratitude for National Parks
- Hiker on Gratitude for National Parks
- Chris Zinda on Gratitude for National Parks
- Frank Krosnicki on Gratitude for National Parks
- Ed Loosli on Conservation Groups Threaten To Sue On East Paradise Grazing Decision
What seems to be missing here is what the US Constitution has to say which has repeatedly been affirmed by Supreme Court rulings practically since the beginning of the Republic. The waters of the US belong to the people and are “highways” of commerce. No state shall pass any law which limits the rights of the people to use such waterways for any legitimate purpose, nor may any private entity bar such use and/or free passage.
A landowner can’t step into the road and announce “I own this property and you may not pass.”
Crap. I’m expecting a firestorm over this one, and it’s interesting to see this get tabled so soon after Trout Unlimited’s National body tried to withdraw itself from access issues (that’s been tabled too).