Frank Robbins isn’t just any rancher. He moved to Wyoming from the South and purchased a large ranch north of Thermopolis. There has been controversy ever since. His lawsuit against BLM employees as individuals, rather than as agents of the government, was unprecedented. A different outcome would have made the BLM an even weaker agency than it already is when is comes to protecting the land from overgrazing and other abuses.

Story. Wilkie v. Robbins, rancher loses in high court. AP

Analysis June 27, by Brodie Farquhar. Rancher’s tactics didn’t fly. Casper Star Tribune.
p.s. The attorney from Advocates for the West and Western Watersheds Project is Laird Lucas, not Blair Lucas, as printed in the article.

 
avatar
About The Author

Ralph Maughan

Dr. Ralph Maughan is professor emeritus of political science at Idaho State University with specialties in natural resource politics, public opinion, interest groups, political parties, voting and elections. Aside from academic publications, he is author or co-author of three hiking/backpacking guides, and he is President of the Western Watersheds Project.

3 Responses to Rancher loses BLM fight in the US Supreme Court

  1. avatar mikarooni says:

    Conservatonists also need to be made aware of who stepped up to serve as Robbins’ lawyers, their history, what they have been involved with in the past, and how their participation might raise the chances that Robbins and this suit were intended to be about a lot more than just a squabble over an access road. The Trojan Horse was not about equine sculpture and the conservation community needs to know what’s really up with both this case and these particular lawyers.

  2. avatar No1Cowboy says:

    Listen to what Mikarooni says. This fight–and it WAS a fight–was more about greed, power and money. Locking up public lands from neighbors and the general public was a defacto claim of ‘ownership’ over them. That, coupled with the belief that with enough money anything is possible, are both the seeds and fuel of the conflict. Chronic overgrazing on public land was the proximate trigger, but the fight was over who controlled public lands leased by Robbins and the aurthority of the BLM to require access and reasonable stewardship. Robbins refusal, over several years, to acknowledge the BLMs role in the managment of public lands was the final straw. Robbins’ neighbors are still celebrating!

  3. I had heard that Robbins would not grant access to some of his neighbors to their own property.

Calendar

June 2007
S M T W T F S
« May   Jul »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Quote

‎"At some point we must draw a line across the ground of our home and our being, drive a spear into the land and say to the bulldozers, earthmovers, government and corporations, “thus far and no further.” If we do not, we shall later feel, instead of pride, the regret of Thoreau, that good but overly-bookish man, who wrote, near the end of his life, “If I repent of anything it is likely to be my good behaviour."

~ Edward Abbey

%d bloggers like this: