Payette Forest bighorn sheep decision expected out soon

Rocky Barker blogs about the bighorn sheep issue in Idaho.  

Payette Forest bighorn sheep decision expected out soon – Letters from the West 

But the ranchers who still run sheep are a hardy and dedicated bunch. They don’t want to give up a long family tradition. In fact, they want to pass it down to their kids.

It sounds nice, and of course this narrative of “family rancher” remains the party-line in Western states – incessantly chimed at agency meetings, hearings, other official gatherings, among politicians and echoed with implicit tones of admiration in regional (and especially local) media outlets.  But when one digs deeper we find a much different “family tradition”  involved in the business of running sheep on federal public lands in Idaho (and other western states).  Avid outdoors-folk see it.  The sheepman affected by the Payette Forest’s draft environmental impact statement run their business hiring others, in large part immigrants who are exploited by way of pay woefully below minimum wage ~ at the very least

And the bighorn…

Fewer than 17 sheepman have enough sheep to speak of, let alone be significantly affected by the protection of bighorn sheep on federal grazing allotments in the state of Idaho – the number of sheepman holding allotments actually in conflict with bighorn is fewer.  Among those sheepman are the rich and politically connected in the state who were successfully represented by Idaho Woolgrower’s lobbyist Stan Boyd when he, the governor, and state reps browbeat the Idaho Department of Fish and Game (IDFG) into developing policy that would heighten the priority of these few sheepman’s collection of federal subsidies ($346,887 in Idaho in 2006) for wool (using public land allotments and archaic/exploitative labor practices) over the Department’s efforts to preserve bighorn.  The move exposes Idaho’s cherished bighorn to deadly disease and threatens the Department’s significant efforts (re-introductions of the past) to restore this “Monarch of the Mountain” to its rightful habitat in the state.  It also makes clear the significant degree to which the IDFG has become a politicized puppet of ag interests in the state – beholden to the Idaho sheep industry’s “long family tradition“.









  1. Ryan Avatar

    I hate land maggots, I hope the state does the right thing.

  2. Mary Jane Mucklestone Avatar
    Mary Jane Mucklestone

    My aunt Lori Quilliam, is one of the ” hardy and dedicated bunch”. She has lived in Wild Horse River Canyon for 44 years. Cattle and Sheep have been her income. She and my late uncle Jay Quilliam are the hardest working people I have ever known. Since my uncle’s death 14 years ago, Lori has turned increasingly to Sheep as they are easier for her to handle alone. Her land is surrounded by federal land. To ban sheep from private land bordering National Forest will force her off the land she has tirelessly worked her entire adult life. Perhaps she does not “have enough sheep to speak of”, she has only enough to make a living. If an ban such as Arizona has. is enacted in Idaho, she will be put out of business, she will have no income.

Subscribe to get new posts right in your Inbox

Brian Ertz