Grazing Provisions in Bishop’s Utah Public Lands Bill Are Poison Pills
By Jonathan Ratner, Wyoming Director, Western Watersheds Project
Representative Rob Bishop’s Utah Public Lands bill isn’t just a bad deal for Utahns who want to see Bears Ears protected as a national monument, but it’s also a terrible bill for public lands in general. Included in the sweeping language is binding provisions that would require the federal land management agencies to maintain in perpetuity the existing levels of livestock grazing on public grazing allotments, regardless of the adverse ecological or cultural impacts the land use is causing. It’s essentially a free pass to abuse and overuse our public trust resources, and it limits the government’s ability to manage in accordance with recent science.
It isn’t just designed to tie the government’s hands on grazing management in Utah, but across all federal lands. Section 1303 of the bill guts all laws and regulations designed to protect our public lands from abuse. The bill would require the agencies to maintain the same level of grazing on all federal public lands at the time of enactment, “except for cases of extreme range conditions where water and forage is not available.” In areas on public land where grazing has been previously been reduced or eliminated due to conflicts with wildlife or other important conservation values, grazing will be “reviewed and managed to support grazing at an economically viable level.” In other words, the conservation management of the past will be undone and profit will take precedence over all other values.
For example, in areas where there are potential conflicts between disease carrying domestic sheep and bighorn sheep, the agencies would be required to maintain the same levels of domestic sheep and cattle grazing even if there is a high risk of disease transmission to vulnerable bighorn sheep populations. This means that bighorn sheep would not be protected from private industrial uses even in the wildest parts of our national forests and deserts.
This is a hostile takeover of our precious public lands by the rich and powerful, defining management in accordance with extractive interests instead of the multiple uses by the majority of Americans that include wildlife viewing, watershed health, and recreation. Though the bill doesn’t directly affect public access to public lands, entrenching unsustainable livestock levels will diminish the opportunities for other lands users to enjoy the open spaces.
Unfortunately, this hijacking of our public lands by extremists in Utah is not an anomaly. These kinds of corrupt processes that destroy our public lands are happening all around the west. The same people who organized this Utah debacle have set up similarly corrupt processes in Wyoming and other states.

Ken Cole
Ken Cole is a 5th generation Idahoan, an avid fly fisherman, wildlife enthusiast, and photographer. He is the interim Idaho Director for Western Watersheds Project. We do not accept unsolicited “guest” authors or advertising.
One Response to Grazing Provisions in Bishop’s Utah Public Lands Bill Are Poison Pills
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Join 996 other subscribersRecent Posts
- Yellowstone Bison DEIS Comments September 20, 2023
- Logging Creates “Unhealthy” Forests With Less Resilence September 12, 2023
- How Thinning Impacts Fuels September 11, 2023
- The Proposed Ambler Mine and Road–Implications For The Kobuk River Ecosystem And People. August 27, 2023
- The Social Carbon Cost of Public Land Livestock Grazing August 24, 2023
Recent Comments
- Selina Sweet on Yellowstone Bison DEIS Comments
- Jeff Hoffman on Logging Creates “Unhealthy” Forests With Less Resilence
- Jeff Hoffman on Logging Creates “Unhealthy” Forests With Less Resilence
- Jeff Hoffman on How Thinning Impacts Fuels
- Mike Higgins on Logging Creates “Unhealthy” Forests With Less Resilence
- lou on Logging Creates “Unhealthy” Forests With Less Resilence
- Jerry Thiessen on How Thinning Impacts Fuels
- Richard Halsey on How Thinning Impacts Fuels
- midlaj on The Social Carbon Cost of Public Land Livestock Grazing
- Barrie K Gilbert on The Proposed Ambler Mine and Road–Implications For The Kobuk River Ecosystem And People.
- Maggie Frazier on Logging Road Impacts
- China Kantner on The Proposed Ambler Mine and Road–Implications For The Kobuk River Ecosystem And People.
- Ida Lupine on Tribal Burning and Fire Suppression
- Mareks Vilkins on Tribal Burning and Fire Suppression
- Selina Sweet on The Proposed Ambler Mine and Road–Implications For The Kobuk River Ecosystem And People.
“In other words, the conservation management of the past will be undone and profit will take precedence over all other values”
Thanks Ken, for continuing to remind folks of these important issues regarding “our” public lands.
Haying time in my area, a bumper crop again this year. What to do, what to do, with this year’s crop (hay) when a good portion of last year’s crop (rows & rows of round bales stacked in fields) was never used this past winter?
I have an idea! How bout keeping the cows at home next summer and give public lands a break 🙂