Political shell game imperils iconic bird of the American West

Reprinted from Waco Tribune-Herald March 9, 2019

By Steve Holmer, American Bird Conservancy

Wildlife experts concluded in 2015 that the Greater Sage-Grouse, an iconic bird of the West, did not require listing under the Endangered Species Act, thanks to then-new federal management plans with added conservation requirements. Many conservation groups, including American Bird Conservancy, supported the monumental process leading up to these plans — and the decision not to list this species under these circumstances.

Clearly, the 2015 plans of the Bureau of Land Management and Forest Service, though a major step forward, were not perfect and could be improved. But the plans did provide a few essential elements, including guiding oil and gas development away from priority habitat and providing protection from mining in the highest-priority habitats, called sagebrush focal areas.

As it turned out, had the beleaguered bird been listed in 2015, we wouldn’t now be watching years of effort to save the Greater Sage-Grouse be washed away almost overnight. The many promises to conserve the grouse and its habitat are now purposefully being abandoned as federal agencies are on the verge of finalizing new plans that remove essential safeguards.

These plans are expected to cancel the prioritization of oil and gas drilling away from priority habitat, along with protections for sagebrush focal areas. Mitigation and adaptive management requirements will be severely weakened. The consistent theme in the revisions to the Bureau of Land Management’s and Forest Service’s grouse plans is the addition of more oil and gas development, even in priority grouse habitat. In fact, leasing for new developments has already resumed.

Meanwhile, Greater Sage-Grouse populations remain in serious trouble. Recent reports indicate that numbers are declining in Oregon and Montana, and that sage-grouse are nearly extirpated from both North and South Dakota. Neither listed nor protected otherwise, the Greater Sage-Grouse now sits exposed.

American Bird Conservancy and other groups believe this is a watershed moment. We join many other groups in protesting the revised management plans and opposing renewed oil and gas leasing in priority grouse habitat. We urge the federal agencies to withdraw their flawed revised grouse plans and to restore the earlier, widely supported plans, which were endorsed by states where the grouse is found. We ask that the federal agencies restore the mitigation and adaptive management requirements and fully consider the negative climate impacts of fossil-fuel development on public lands.

We also request that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service now conduct a renewed status review of the species to assess the recent population decline and the effect of increased development in grouse habitat. We must determine whether the remaining protections are adequate to keep the grouse from going extinct. Finally, we ask that Congress remove the ESA listing moratorium on sage-grouse, in effect since 2014. No species should be exempted from the act for political reasons. Citizens can petition Congress in support of Sage-Grouse here: abcbirds.org/action/ petition-sage-grouse

Steve Holmer, vice president of policy for American Bird Conservancy, has been working on the Greater Sage-Grouse Conservation Strategy since 2009.



, ,




  1. idaursine Avatar

    Not surprised that those opposed to having the Sage Grouse protected by the ESA had no intention of keeping their word. And I suppose they still allow hunting of sage grouse despite their dwindling numbers?

    I wonder if it can be taken to court, the fact that protections were never done as promised by the ‘unprecedented collaboration’ fanfare:


  2. Bruce Bowen Avatar
    Bruce Bowen

    The American conservation public refuses to believe how lawless the federal government has become. I spoke with several volunteers on the sage grouse project in 2015 and told them that I did not believe the BLM would honor its responsibility to protect the habitat. My comments were met with scorn and disbelief. The BLM is not there to protect habitat -it is there to foster capitalism I said.
    They thought I was just a crazy old guy from a by gone time.

    The BLM was turned into a classic dysfunctional bureaucracy( the kind described by Max Weber) by the Reagan/Watt administration and it has only gotten worse. The BLM needs to be replaced and the structure for dealing with resource extraction must be changed if anything is to survive. You don’t make deals with dysfunctional organizations.

    As I said before, greater sage grouse have about much chance of survival under current circumstances as did the last 450 off reservation Lakotas did at Wounded Knee.

    1. Ed-L Avatar

      Bruce Bowen: Hear Hear!! When will we ever learn?

Subscribe to get new posts right in your Inbox