Wolves are smart, family-oriented animals and science demonstrates that problems with livestock increase following wolf removals. So why does the government keep removing wolves in response to conflict with livestock and hope that solves the same problem?

Right now, in the Gila National Forest, there is a wolf family that is facing a huge amount of hostility for their ongoing conflicts with public lands livestock grazing operations. But before the Fish and Wildlife Service decides to remove or kill any more wolves, it should first consider the human-caused adversity that these wolves are facing.

Despite the protections of the Endangered Species Act ostensibly afforded to lobos, a shocking number in the Prieto Pack have been killed, removed, and maimed by people. In November 2018, a young female from the pack was found dead, and the incident is still under investigation. In December 2018, a male and female were seen dragging private traps on their legs and then caught and removed from the wild by the Fish and Wildlife Service. The female died in captivity and the male lost his leg.

Another Prieto male was found dead in February 2019, and in March, the Fish and Wildlife Service removed two young wolves from this family, only one of whom was released back to the wild. And then, in November 2019, two more Prieto wolf pups were trapped by a private trapper, and one subsequently lost her foot when the trap fell off; the other was taken into captivity for veterinary care and released in December. And these are just the incidents we know of; other wolves from the pack may have been illegally killed but remain unfound or unidentified. (All of these incidents are reported in the monthly reports posted by the Arizona Game and Fish Department.)

Killing or permanently capturing wolves rarely solves more problems than it creates. Wolves are social animals and family is everything. A mix of accidental or illegal killings and injuries, untimely dispersals and disappearances, and vulnerable livestock in the woods in winter is a recipe for conflict. At least three wolf packs use this same territory in the Gila, demonstrating that it is prime wolf habitat, and maybe not such a great place for livestock.

The Prieto Pack is currently under fire for preying on livestock at the same ranch in the same problematic part of the Gila National Forest as last year. There’s talk of removing some of the family members in the interest of conflict reduction. It’s clear that manipulation of this family is at least part of the reason that they are preying on livestock as opposed to native prey, and contrary to established science, the agency thinks doing more of the same will solve the problem.

History is repeating itself, but the Fish and Wildlife Service can change this story.  Rather than removing any more Prieto wolves, the federal agencies should recognize that this is a problem grazing allotment, remove the livestock instead of disrupting this struggling family of wolves, and let the wolves be wolves.

About The Author

Greta Anderson

Greta Anderson is a plant nerd, a desert rat, and a fan of wildness. She is the Deputy Director of Western Watersheds Project and lives on the land of the Tohono O'Odham and Yaqui people in what is now called Arizona. Greta's opinions and world views are not necessarily reflected in the posts of other authors on this blog.

13 Responses to Removing Prieto Wolves is Not the Answer

  1. Caroline Eck says:

    Thank you very much for this insightful article!

  2. Dale Houston says:

    Why should the ranchers have say on public land. This is ridiculous that the US Wildlife is favoring the greedy ranchers.

  3. idaursine says:

    I have been thinking about the coyote killing contests too – and I have come to the conclusion that people just don’t know about these things.

    Contests where coyotes are piled up like cordwood despite having a year-round hunting season with no bag limit is just plain greedy, and wrong. The participants seem to love blood and gore.

    What’s happening in Colorado ought to be interesting to watch. Once people know about what goes on, I hope they will value their public lands and the wildlife in them more than beef.

  4. Lonna O'Leary says:

    Well said.

  5. Kirk Robinson says:

    Thanks for this insightful update. There should be no private trapping in areas where wolves roam.

  6. Ann Woltjen says:

    Are these Mexican wolves in the Prieto pack? Are there any gray wolves in the Gila Forest?

  7. Let nature take care of nature instead of humans decimating everything that they c as a problem

  8. Ida Lupine says:


    “According to three memos dated late-March from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service detailing the authorization, the animals were killed because of ongoing “wolf-caused depredations of livestock,” or the wolves were believed to be killing nearby livestock.”



January 2020


‎"At some point we must draw a line across the ground of our home and our being, drive a spear into the land and say to the bulldozers, earthmovers, government and corporations, “thus far and no further.” If we do not, we shall later feel, instead of pride, the regret of Thoreau, that good but overly-bookish man, who wrote, near the end of his life, “If I repent of anything it is likely to be my good behaviour."

~ Edward Abbey

%d bloggers like this: