New road was created for a forest thinning project. Roads are a major location for human ignition. Photo George Wuerthner 

The Biden administration announced it would spend nearly $930 million fighting wildfire in the West. While the plan includes money for everything from hardening homes to paying for more firefighters, the main thrust of the proposal is to increase thinning/logging and prescribed burning to “reduce” fuels.

It is part of a 10-year plan to “treat” 50 million acres, an area bigger than all of New England.

Many of these “active forest management” treatments require road access, thus either creating new roads or being used as an excuse to keep existing roads open and available for forestry management.

The elephant in the room is that roads are among the factors that contribute to greater human ignitions. Humans ignited four times as many large fires as lightning.

A review of 1.5 million fire records over 20 years found that human-caused fires were responsible for 84% of wildfires and 44% of the total area burned.

Once created roads are difficult to close to human access. A “closed” road on the Sequoia National Forest, California. ATVs just go around ineffective road closure. Photo George Wuerthner 

There is, however, a better way to spend funds. The majority of all wildfires are due to human ignitions that occur on or near roads.

Higher road density correlates with an increased probability of human-caused ignitions. But higher road density even correlates with greater lightning blazes.

The disturbance caused by logging roads increase the invasion of weeds, many of them flammable. Photo George Wuerthner 

Research has also demonstrated that roads act as corridors for the spread of flammable weeds. Roads also create a natural vector for wind and vegetation drying, enhancing fire spread.

While blazes that start in roadless areas tend to burn more acres, they pose a smaller threat to human communities. However, since roads are more likely to be closer to human habitation, the increased number of ignitions associated with roaded landscapes may be a greater threat to structures and human life.

The Forest Service has nearly 400,000 miles of roads—more than enough to circle the globe 16 times.

Even so-called “closed” roads provide increased human use and access to the landscape.  Adding a gate does little to reduce the negative influences of roads on fire spread, weed invasion, water pollution from sedimentaion, displacement of wildlife and other impacts. Photo George Wuerthner 

These roads provide access for cars and pick-ups. However, even when they are closed to street vehicles, the roads still provide access for All Terrain Vehicles (ATVs) and even mountain bikes, allowing human penetration into landscapes and increasing fire ignitions.

A more effective strategy for reducing wildfire threats to communities would be to spend significant funding by decommissioning and fully recontouring former logging roads, including so-called temporary roads. Not only would road closure and restoration of roadbed slopes reduce unwanted ignitions, but they would have other benefits as well.

Road created for thinning projects like this one in Yaak drainage, Montana is a chronic source of sedimentation into stream, harming aquatic ecosystems. Photo George Wuerthner 

Roads also impact watersheds and aquatic ecosystems. For example, one of the biggest sources of sedimentation into aquatic ecosystems around the West is logging roads which are a chaotic source of sedimentation.

Roads also harm wildlife by direct mortality as well as social displacement.

Decommissioning and restoration of roads also have carbon storage benefits. Fuel reductions do nothing to change the climate, and since logging is a significant source of carbon emissions, it may even enhance wildfire spread in the future.

Do you see the road? Hopefully not. That’s the point. Here a logging road in Redwood National Park, California was recontoured and revegetated effectively reducing most negative influences of roads, including human access. Photo George Wuerthner 

Shifting the emphasis of funding from more thinning/logging and prescribed fire towards reducing road densities may have greater benefits for reducing wildfire threats to communities, not to mention other resource values such as reduction in wildlife disturbance, soil erosion, aquatic ecosystem degradation, and even carbon losses.

About The Author

George Wuerthner

George Wuerthner is an ecologist and former hunting guide with a degree in wildlife biology

2 Responses to Wildfire–Road Removal A More Effective Wildfire Strategy

  1. Jeff Hoffman says:

    Roads are a major type of ecological destruction. Not only do they cause erosion and fragment habitat, but they allow extractive industries to enter areas. Oppose all new roads!

  2. Deane Rimerman says:

    Roads are definitely a vector for ecosystem destruction and lower road density has definitely been found in paper after paper to indicate greater ecosystem health/less human disturbance.

    Of course the challenge is status quo foresters and the industry’s lobbyists will forever argue that road access is essential to fighting wildfires, which is why “containment” is essentially bulldozing a road around the entire perimeter of a wildfire, which is horrendously harmful.

    So we’ve got our work cut out for us when it comes to turning this whole screwed up way of thinking about firefighting as something that requires destruction of the forest to stop it, rather than firefighting as something you adapt to by simplifying & hardening infrastructure & homes with foil fabric tents so fires can be allowed to periodically move through an area without having to turn the whole landscape into a war zone of barren ground thinking that we can stop it.

    As always, the most flammable thing in the forest are the houses!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


January 2023


‎"At some point we must draw a line across the ground of our home and our being, drive a spear into the land and say to the bulldozers, earthmovers, government and corporations, “thus far and no further.” If we do not, we shall later feel, instead of pride, the regret of Thoreau, that good but overly-bookish man, who wrote, near the end of his life, “If I repent of anything it is likely to be my good behaviour."

~ Edward Abbey

%d bloggers like this: