The next 200 or so loads are still on the table-

Boise attorney Merlyn Clark, hearing officer on the oil megaloads that will use U.S. Highway 12 across north central Idaho into Montana has ruled that the first 4 megaloads could be transported safely with “minimum inconvenience” up narrow U.S. Highway 12 to the Montana border (Lolo Pass).

These giant loads have been sitting at Idaho’s sea port of Lewiston for a month now. There is still some paperwork before their transport can begin, but little doubt we will see what actually happens as they take them up along the Clearwater and Lochsa River to the Bitterroot Divide and down into Montana.  The first 4 loads are for the Billings, MT oil refinery, not the Alberta tar sand pits.

The usual groups, such as the Idaho Farm Bureau (how is this a farm issue?), have been promoting the idea that moving this equipment along Highway 12 at night will be some kind of boom for business, although no explanation how that will happen.

There will be a big difference between the transport of 4 megaloads versus the next 200 (which are not included in this hearing officer’s decision).

Idaho agency advised to issue megaload permits. By John Miller. The Associated Press (in Bloomberg).

Tagged with:
 
avatar
About The Author

Ralph Maughan

Dr. Ralph Maughan is professor emeritus of political science at Idaho State University with specialties in natural resource politics, public opinion, interest groups, political parties, voting and elections. Aside from academic publications, he is author or co-author of three hiking/backpacking guides, and he is President of the Western Watersheds Project.

4 Responses to Hearing officer says "yes" to first 4 oil megaloads

  1. avatar Salle says:

    Well, that’s the Idaho side of the argument for now. I think that in Montana there is an order for an EA before they can roll over the state line. I have to look for a source, I heard it on the radio…

    • avatar Salle says:

      Turnouts for oilfield megaloads yet to be built in Montana

      http://missoulian.com/news/local/article_bb9ad578-010a-11e0-82c0-001cc4c03286.html

      Lynch explained the steps his department went through, under the auspices of the Montana Environmental Policy Act, to process Imperial/Exxon’s permit applications. An environmental impact statement, as many people including Missoula County commissioners formally requested, wasn’t initially required because a MEPA checklist didn’t point that direction.

      Had the project entailed realignment of highways, the purchase of right of way or the installation of bridges, Lynch said the environmental assessment step would most likely have been bypassed in favor of a more thorough EIS.

      In the transportation department’s initial review of the project, “there was a lot of discussion whether or not they needed an environmental assessment or not,” said Lynch.

  2. avatar Craig says:

    How is this even safe? Look at the tripcheck cams, why would they be doing this now? Summer I could see, but now no way in hell!

  3. avatar Ken Cole says:

    I have a feeling that the legislature will intervene here shortly. Their session starts in a few days. This is the feudal society of Idaho afterall.

Calendar

December 2010
S M T W T F S
« Nov   Jan »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  

Quote

‎"At some point we must draw a line across the ground of our home and our being, drive a spear into the land and say to the bulldozers, earthmovers, government and corporations, “thus far and no further.” If we do not, we shall later feel, instead of pride, the regret of Thoreau, that good but overly-bookish man, who wrote, near the end of his life, “If I repent of anything it is likely to be my good behaviour."

~ Edward Abbey

%d bloggers like this: