Proposition 2 on Idaho ballot opposed
There are many copycat measures in other states. I have heard of almost no non-paid support for prop 2, which would by trick not only take away the protection you get from zoning but defeat efforts to conserve open space all over the West.
The features in Prop 2 on “takings” have no historical basis in American law or English common law. They are a radical reading of property rights that give power to the few to destroy the property of others (unless money is paid to the aggressor). It it also totally incompatible with protecting our precious land from disordered development.
From today’s Idaho Statesman.
Proposition 2 will take away property rights, not protect them. By Vern Bisterfeldt (Boise City Council)
Idaho Nature Conservancy opposes Proposition 2. By Ken Pursley. (Chair of the Idaho Nature Conservancy)
In late news, Proposition 2 is now being attacked from the right in Idaho as well as the left and center. Just go back to New York City, Howie Rich! Note that the Bill Sali referred to the link to the blog above is the Republican’s candidate for the US House first district in Idaho. Most Republicans leaders don’t like him (except recently when he has been carefully hugged with GOP leaders flown in, followed by the statement “he will [at least] keep the seat in Republican hands.”)

Ralph Maughan
Dr. Ralph Maughan is professor emeritus of political science at Idaho State University. He was a Western Watersheds Project Board Member off and on for many years, and was also its President for several years. For a long time he produced Ralph Maughan's Wolf Report. He was a founder of the Greater Yellowstone Coalition. He and Jackie Johnson Maughan wrote three editions of "Hiking Idaho." He also wrote "Beyond the Tetons" and "Backpacking Wyoming's Teton and Washakie Wilderness." He created and is the administrator of The Wildlife News.
One Response to Proposition 2 on Idaho ballot opposed
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Join 1,000 other subscribersRecent Posts
- Save Wild Bison December 1, 2023
- Livestock Grazing In Wilderness Areas November 28, 2023
- The Dept of Interior Bans M-44s or Cyanide Bombs On BLM Lands November 22, 2023
- Montana Headwaters Legacy Act Introduced November 17, 2023
- How the Media and Some Researchers Mislead The Public On Prescribed Burning November 15, 2023
Recent Comments
- Jeff Hoffman on Save Wild Bison
- Jeff Hoffman on Save Wild Bison
- Ida Lupine on Save Wild Bison
- Jerry Thiessen on Save Wild Bison
- Ida Lupine on Save Wild Bison
- Jeff Hoffman on Livestock Grazing In Wilderness Areas
- Ida Lupine on Livestock Grazing In Wilderness Areas
- Robert Raven on Livestock Grazing In Wilderness Areas
- Jeff Hoffman on Livestock Grazing In Wilderness Areas
- Jeff Hoffman on Livestock Grazing In Wilderness Areas
- Maggie Frazier on Livestock Grazing In Wilderness Areas
- Maggie Frazier on Livestock Grazing In Wilderness Areas
- Jeff Hoffman on Livestock Grazing In Wilderness Areas
- Jeff Hoffman on Livestock Grazing In Wilderness Areas
- Jeff Hoffman on Livestock Grazing In Wilderness Areas
In California, the equivalent swindle is Prop 90.
Vote NO.
What is the equivalent in your state?