Challenge to Wyoming's elk feeding/killing program fails in federal court
The judge ruled Wyoming’s program to test elk for brucellosis before they enter a winter feedlot (and kill the elk if it tests positive for brucellosis anti-bodies) was not an arbitrary and capricious decision. Indeed that legal standard is a high bar (that a government program is arbitrary and capricious).
Livestock groups were happy because it means they won’t have to share any winter range with elk (as ranchers do in most other Western states).
There is no way this test and slaughter will reduce the brucellosis infection rate because there are too many “false negatives” as well as even more “false positives” in the crude test they use.
I continue to be amazed that Wyoming’s version of the group “Sportsmen for Fish and Wildlife” continues to support this worthless elk killing program and yet keep a straight face when they talk about how horrible it is that predatory animals kill elk. I guess elk dying a natural death to predation is bad and a stupid bureaucratic-ordered death is acceptable.
Story in the Billings Gazette. Elk-feeding challenge rejected
post 1501

Ralph Maughan
Dr. Ralph Maughan is professor emeritus of political science at Idaho State University. He has been a Western Watersheds Project Board Member off and on for many years, and also its President. For many years he produced Ralph Maughan's Wolf Report. He was a founder of the Greater Yellowstone Coalition. He and Jackie Johnson Maughan wrote three editions of "Hiking Idaho." He also wrote "Beyond the Tetons" and "Backpacking Wyoming's Teton and Washakie Wilderness." He created and is the administrator of The Wildlife News.
One Response to Challenge to Wyoming's elk feeding/killing program fails in federal court
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Join 931 other subscribersRecent Posts
- Travesty of Tribal Slaughter of Yellowstone Bison February 2, 2023
- Yellowstone and the Land of Hope January 30, 2023
- Time to Reevaluate Notion That Oregon’s Rivers Are A Faucet For Agriculture January 27, 2023
- Indian Influence On The Extinction of Bison In Southeast Idaho and Adjacent Areas January 27, 2023
- Chaparral and Wildfire January 25, 2023
Recent Comments
- Glenn Monahan on Travesty of Tribal Slaughter of Yellowstone Bison
- laurie on Travesty of Tribal Slaughter of Yellowstone Bison
- Rich on Travesty of Tribal Slaughter of Yellowstone Bison
- Ida Lupine on Travesty of Tribal Slaughter of Yellowstone Bison
- Jeff Hoffman on Travesty of Tribal Slaughter of Yellowstone Bison
- Ralph Maughan on Travesty of Tribal Slaughter of Yellowstone Bison
- Ralph Maughan on Time to Assess Sec of Interior Deb Haaland
- Victoria Edwards on Time to Assess Sec of Interior Deb Haaland
- Joseph Y. on Travesty of Tribal Slaughter of Yellowstone Bison
- Mike sauber on Travesty of Tribal Slaughter of Yellowstone Bison
- Ida Lupine on Travesty of Tribal Slaughter of Yellowstone Bison
- Susan Rhem-Westhoff on Travesty of Tribal Slaughter of Yellowstone Bison
- Glenn Monahan on Travesty of Tribal Slaughter of Yellowstone Bison
- Jeff Hoffman on Travesty of Tribal Slaughter of Yellowstone Bison
- Ida Lupine on Yellowstone and the Land of Hope
Having just returned from a pack trip to the mountains, I’ve just now learned about this decision on Wyoming’s elk feedgrounds. Obviously, I have yet to read the decision. However, it is clearly flawed.
Let us not forget that the courts once upheld segregation too.
The primary issue of this lawsuit was not Wyoming’s program per se, but the failure of the federal government to conduct the necessary NEPA analysis before issuing special use permits to the Wyoming Game & Fish Department to carry out the feedground program. Given that elk feedgrounds do have a primae facie major impact on the human environment, in NEPA terms, the judge’s decision is rationally inexplicable. It does show what a stranglehold the livestock industry has over judicial decision-making in the west, even in the federal courts.
Once I get cleaned up and find a copy of the judge’s decision, perhaps I can talk more in depth about it.