Rocky Barker’s blog: Roadless rule resolution may wait for next administration. Rocky Barker. Idaho Statesman.
Barkers writes about the latest chapter in the struggle over national forest roadless areas. This is a battle that has been going on since the early 1970s, but especially since President Bill Clinton gave an executive order to protect all remaining roadless areas over 5000 acres in size on the national forests and President Bush replaced it with a much less protective rule.
by
Want to join the discussion?
Fantastic, here are the ground rules: No personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats. Keep it clean, civil and on topic. The Wildlife News does not fact check every comment but, when noticed, submissions containing clear misinformation, demonstrably false statements of fact or links to sites trafficking in such will not be posted.
Dr. Ralph Maughan is professor emeritus of political science at Idaho State University. He was a Western Watersheds Project Board Member off and on for many years, and was also its President for several years. For a long time he produced Ralph Maughan’s Wolf Report. He was a founder of the Greater Yellowstone Coalition. He and Jackie Johnson Maughan wrote three editions of “Hiking Idaho.” He also wrote “Beyond the Tetons” and “Backpacking Wyoming’s Teton and Washakie Wilderness.” He created and is the administrator of The Wildlife News.
Comments
Is Rocky suggesting that the Idaho roadless plan is acceptable?
Seems that he is, which is unfortunate, because the real trouble with the “exceptions” in the original Roadless Rule is that they give too much credence to the old tired argument that roads might be needed to protect against fire. Roads, of course, actually dry out the forest and introduce invasive species.
This is not to suggest that there shouldn’t be provisions for discretionary management decisions, but that those provisions should give better guidance.
This reminds me once more that I need to mail off the Letter to the Editor I recently wrote pertaining to this issue.
The roadless articles coming from Barker’s columns seem anti-roadless.