Forest Service is writing rules to help privatize your lands in favor of outfitters
We could see it in the Idaho wolf population management plan, and now we see in the rules the Forest Service is developing regarding allocation of recreation on public lands.
Story in the Casper Star Tribune. Sweet deal for outfitters? By Brodie Farquhar.
Ever since the Pombo-Gibbons bill to give away our public lands to the mining companies was slapped down in December 2005, there has been an upsurge in interest in keeping and protecting our American public lands from the special interests who want to privatize (steal) them from us.
Because citizens are more watchful now, those who want to grab our lands are getting more sneaky. Senator Larry Craig has always been one of the biggest land-grabbers, and the Forest Service still marches to his tune because his former aide Mark Rey oversees the FS.
Update: thanks to Robert Hoskins, here are the proposed regulations

Ralph Maughan
Dr. Ralph Maughan is professor emeritus of political science at Idaho State University. He has been a Western Watersheds Project Board Member off and on for many years, and also its President. For many years he produced Ralph Maughan's Wolf Report. He was a founder of the Greater Yellowstone Coalition. He and Jackie Johnson Maughan wrote three editions of "Hiking Idaho." He also wrote "Beyond the Tetons" and "Backpacking Wyoming's Teton and Washakie Wilderness." He created and is the administrator of The Wildlife News.
2 Responses to Forest Service is writing rules to help privatize your lands in favor of outfitters
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Recent Posts
- Custer Gallatin NF Kirk Hill Project Another Boondoggle May 28, 2022
- “Stick to the Facts”–How Green Groups Fail to Protect the Gallatin Range May 23, 2022
- Bi State Sage Grouse Reinstated As Proposed Threatened By Court May 19, 2022
- BLM Fails To Protect Public Patrimony Through Renewal of Grazing Privileges Without Environmental Review May 17, 2022
- Conservation Groups Threaten To Sue On East Paradise Grazing Decision May 12, 2022
Recent Comments
- Deane Rimerman on Custer Gallatin NF Kirk Hill Project Another Boondoggle
- Michael Kellett on Custer Gallatin NF Kirk Hill Project Another Boondoggle
- Ida Lupine on Bi State Sage Grouse Reinstated As Proposed Threatened By Court
- Ida Lupine on Gratitude for National Parks
- Maggie Frazier on “Stick to the Facts”–How Green Groups Fail to Protect the Gallatin Range
- Maggie Frazier on “Stick to the Facts”–How Green Groups Fail to Protect the Gallatin Range
- Ida Lupine on “Stick to the Facts”–How Green Groups Fail to Protect the Gallatin Range
- Ida Lupine on “Stick to the Facts”–How Green Groups Fail to Protect the Gallatin Range
- Linda Healow on “Stick to the Facts”–How Green Groups Fail to Protect the Gallatin Range
- David Patenaude on “Stick to the Facts”–How Green Groups Fail to Protect the Gallatin Range
- Nancy Ostlie on “Stick to the Facts”–How Green Groups Fail to Protect the Gallatin Range
- Jannett Heckert on Conservation Groups Threaten To Sue On East Paradise Grazing Decision
- Rich on Bi State Sage Grouse Reinstated As Proposed Threatened By Court
- Jannett Heckert on BLM Fails To Protect Public Patrimony Through Renewal of Grazing Privileges Without Environmental Review
- rastadoggie on Gratitude for National Parks
Tree by tree these folks are trying to give it all away to corporate America. Amazing stuff. Todd
For those who want to see these proposed rules, here is the URL:
http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20071800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2007/E7-20659.htm
It is my understanding that River Runners for Wilderness has dissected the regs and recommended changes to nullify the damage.