Sublette County, WY supports Green River dam
A stupid program designed to help a tiny number of people in a vain attempt to “help to safeguard the County’s economic and cultural viability” (the purpose, according to the County Commissiors).
If these people wanted to safeguard their economic and cultural viability, they should have opposed the massive natural gas industrialization of Sublette County. Talk about a day late and 50-billion dollars short!
Sublette County supports Green River dam. Booster says Warren Bridge site is best location for impoundment on main stem of river. By Angus M. Thuermer Jr., Jackson Hole, Wy. Jackson Hole News and Guide.

Ralph Maughan
Dr. Ralph Maughan is professor emeritus of political science at Idaho State University. He was a Western Watersheds Project Board Member off and on for many years, and was also its President for several years. For a long time he produced Ralph Maughan's Wolf Report. He was a founder of the Greater Yellowstone Coalition. He and Jackie Johnson Maughan wrote three editions of "Hiking Idaho." He also wrote "Beyond the Tetons" and "Backpacking Wyoming's Teton and Washakie Wilderness." He created and is the administrator of The Wildlife News.
3 Responses to Sublette County, WY supports Green River dam
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Join 996 other subscribersRecent Posts
- Anthropocene Boosters: The Attack On Parks And Wilderness September 29, 2023
- Yellowstone Bison DEIS Comments September 20, 2023
- Logging Creates “Unhealthy” Forests With Less Resilence September 12, 2023
- How Thinning Impacts Fuels September 11, 2023
- The Proposed Ambler Mine and Road–Implications For The Kobuk River Ecosystem And People. August 27, 2023
Recent Comments
- Jerry Thiessen on Anthropocene Boosters: The Attack On Parks And Wilderness
- Chris Zinda on Anthropocene Boosters: The Attack On Parks And Wilderness
- Chris Zinda on Anthropocene Boosters: The Attack On Parks And Wilderness
- Richard Halsey on Anthropocene Boosters: The Attack On Parks And Wilderness
- Chris Zinda on Anthropocene Boosters: The Attack On Parks And Wilderness
- Chris Zinda on Anthropocene Boosters: The Attack On Parks And Wilderness
- Ralph Duane Short on Anthropocene Boosters: The Attack On Parks And Wilderness
- Fred Koontz on Anthropocene Boosters: The Attack On Parks And Wilderness
- Ida Lupine on Anthropocene Boosters: The Attack On Parks And Wilderness
- Ida Lupine on Anthropocene Boosters: The Attack On Parks And Wilderness
- Maggie Frazier on Anthropocene Boosters: The Attack On Parks And Wilderness
- Bill Cunningham on Anthropocene Boosters: The Attack On Parks And Wilderness
- Mneylo on Anthropocene Boosters: The Attack On Parks And Wilderness
- Jerry Thiessen on Anthropocene Boosters: The Attack On Parks And Wilderness
- Selina Sweet on Anthropocene Boosters: The Attack On Parks And Wilderness
Actually, the purpose of such a dam would be to get more water to a few ranchers in the Upper Green, who, by the way, are also beneficiaries of Wyoming’s elk feedgrounds. A pretty selfish bunch.
Also, the comment about the antelope migration is simply false. Archeological investigations have found that the migration of pronghorns along the Upper Green migration corridor is at least 6000 years old. Osborne Russell, who trapped beaver in Rockies from 1834 to 1843, describes in his journal thousands of pronghorn moving along the corridor to winter range in the Green River Basin.
Ugh… You want to see some so-called eco-terrorism? Start building that dam.
note: I do not endorse terrorism of any kind.
note number two: but if I did, it would be the eco-kind.
I don’t think extra-legal means will be necessary here. The proposal has no merit and costs far more than any so-called economic benefits that would come from it–those benefits would go only to a few “known to be extra-greedy” ranchers anyway. Also, the existence of the pronghorn migration corridor has captured the imaginations of many people who both live here and those who don’t. This is something we can kill politically and legally.