Prosecutor: Gillett will not be re-tried. Idaho Mountain Express.
Share this:
- Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
- Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
- Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
- More
- Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
- Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
- Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
- Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
- Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
- Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
Comments
5 responses to “Prosecutor: Gillett will not be re-tried”
NO big suprise. Trials cost a lot of money. Money that our government(s) lack. WHat he did, compared to many court cases, is small potatoes.
I totally think he is reprehensable and guilty as sin…but I am not suprised at all. Though I feel for Lynne, and I hope she sues the civil crap right out of this butthead…I’d rather see the money spent to jail molesters and murderers.
Besides, I think suing him and taking his money would serve as far better punishment for this sub-human jerk.
Maybe the prosecutor can’t find another 12 people in Custer County smart enough to sit on a jury.
I don’t think the prosecutor can seat a jury in that county that will look at the case objectively and make a determination based on the facts of the case…as I said, when this story first broke about the hung jury, the prosecutor should have asked for a change of venue! before the first trial…):
I’m not a lawyer, (thankfully) but I don’t know that a prosecutor can ask for a venue change, I think that’s a defense thing.
I agree that he should be sued in civil court. What did the pictures show that Lynne was taking? That should be some definite piece of evidence? But I’m not surprised about the trial – is the restraining order still in effect?