Wolves capable of as much sensitivity to humans as pet dogs?
Wolves show scientists are barking up the wrong tree
It’s believed that dogs are more sensitive to human gestures and desires than wolves due to their genetic adaptation during thousands of years of domestication.
One recent study indicates this might not be strictly true.

Ralph Maughan
Dr. Ralph Maughan is professor emeritus of political science at Idaho State University. He was a Western Watersheds Project Board Member off and on for many years, and was also its President for several years. For a long time he produced Ralph Maughan's Wolf Report. He was a founder of the Greater Yellowstone Coalition. He and Jackie Johnson Maughan wrote three editions of "Hiking Idaho." He also wrote "Beyond the Tetons" and "Backpacking Wyoming's Teton and Washakie Wilderness." He created and is the administrator of The Wildlife News.
6 Responses to Wolves capable of as much sensitivity to humans as pet dogs?
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Join 995 other subscribersRecent Posts
- Juniper and grasslands–How Cattle Grazing Impacts Ecosystems October 3, 2023
- Anthropocene Boosters: The Attack On Parks And Wilderness September 29, 2023
- Yellowstone Bison DEIS Comments September 20, 2023
- Logging Creates “Unhealthy” Forests With Less Resilence September 12, 2023
- How Thinning Impacts Fuels September 11, 2023
Recent Comments
- MK Ray on Juniper and grasslands–How Cattle Grazing Impacts Ecosystems
- Ed Loosli on Juniper and grasslands–How Cattle Grazing Impacts Ecosystems
- Mike Higgins on Juniper and grasslands–How Cattle Grazing Impacts Ecosystems
- Maggie Frazier on Juniper and grasslands–How Cattle Grazing Impacts Ecosystems
- Jerry Thiessen on Anthropocene Boosters: The Attack On Parks And Wilderness
- Chris Zinda on Anthropocene Boosters: The Attack On Parks And Wilderness
- Chris Zinda on Anthropocene Boosters: The Attack On Parks And Wilderness
- Richard Halsey on Anthropocene Boosters: The Attack On Parks And Wilderness
- Chris Zinda on Anthropocene Boosters: The Attack On Parks And Wilderness
- Chris Zinda on Anthropocene Boosters: The Attack On Parks And Wilderness
- Ralph Duane Short on Anthropocene Boosters: The Attack On Parks And Wilderness
- Fred Koontz on Anthropocene Boosters: The Attack On Parks And Wilderness
- Ida Lupine on Anthropocene Boosters: The Attack On Parks And Wilderness
- Ida Lupine on Anthropocene Boosters: The Attack On Parks And Wilderness
- Maggie Frazier on Anthropocene Boosters: The Attack On Parks And Wilderness
Nice study but in my eyes rather useless to any debate about wolves in the wild. That is of course unless the author’s secret agenda is to populate the wilds with home bred wolves and releasing them. I doubt that is his agenda. In short, once tamed a wolf ceases to be anything but a pet.
TimothyB,
I agree. It’s wild wolves that matter. Though they could be as attentive to us as dogs, it is their wild nature that they choose not to be.
It’s being ignored by a wild animal that infuriates some people.
“It’s being ignored by a wild animal that infuriates some people.”
As an occasional wildlife photographer, being “ignored” is exactly what we hope for…it allows you to capture animal behavior (in the best case scenario) without affecting it!
The Denver Zoo has “wolves” but they might as well be domesticated dogs that haven’t been housebroken yet. They share hardly any of the characteristics of their wild brothers except for staying close to the pack.
Perhaps most people have lost their connection to communicate with these wild animals, since the domestication of humans..
In retrospect, what I would have been more accurate to say is the many people don’t like animals that ignore us in the sense that they neither come up to us purring or waging their tail, or fleeing in alarm.
Many humans want to be shown obvious love or fear.