Research shows the wisdom of keep the smaller fish and throw back the big ones-
Want Sustainable Fishing? Keep Only Small Fish, And Let The Big Ones Go. Science Daily.
Print Friendly
Ralph Maughan
Dr. Ralph Maughan is professor emeritus of political science at Idaho State University with specialties in natural resource politics, public opinion, interest groups, political parties, voting and elections. Aside from academic publications, he is author or co-author of three hiking/backpacking guides, and he is President of the Western Watersheds Project.
If you enjoyed this article, please consider sharing it!
when fishing in the Califormia Sierras a number of years ago, I caught a 12 inch golden trout. For a golden, it was huge. We cooked it for dinner that night. It was tough and the meat was stringy, not at all good. Since then, I have been fishing catch and release. That old fish was a turning point in my angling ethic; toss them back for someone else to catch.
Rick
There is another thing to consider here too. Larger fish also tend to have more mercury and other toxins in them so smaller fish are healthier for you too.
Serious bass fisherman have been doing that for a good while.
Although I am a very strong catch and release fisherman, this concept does not apply to all species, especially trout.
It is sometimes good to reduce the biomass of species in certain waters in order to allow smaller fish to take over. This holds true especially for Trout or Char. This is the approach that both Wyoming and Utah have used in creating sustainable trophy fisheries for Lake Trout, Brook Trout, and now the ever popular Tiger Trout.
Here is a good article from the Utah Division of Wildlife concerning this topic.
http://wildlife.utah.gov/blueribbon/4-step_plan.pdf