With almost none of Obama's Interior nominees confirmed and in office, Harry Reid decides to take on a Republican filibuster so to seat Salazar's number two position
Despite our complaints about Salazar’s views, the GOP has taken unprecedented steps to oppose Salazar’s repeal of Bush’s policies for opposite reasons-
I can’t think of any other Administration where the minority party has tried so hard and been so successful preventing a new President from filling the positions in a government department. Rather than build allies among conservation groups to help in these battles, however, Salazar has pursued his own anti-conservation policies. Time to rethink?
If Reid is successful blocking the filibuster, an irony will be to make Obama even more reliant on his often troublesome views. High noon in Salazar showdown. A key Senate vote on his top aide at Interior is set for today amid high partisan tensions. By Michael Riley. The Denver Post
– – – –
Update. Reid fails to overcome Republican filibuster by 3 votes. Sixty votes are needed to invoke closure — kill a filibuster. New York Times. The vote was 57-39.
Hayes is said to be an environmental lawyer, but there seems to be a question as to how much he worked to protect it versus get corporate lobbyists access in his position during the Clinton Administration.

Ralph Maughan
Dr. Ralph Maughan is professor emeritus of political science at Idaho State University. He has been a Western Watersheds Project Board Member off and on for many years, and also its President. For many years he produced Ralph Maughan's Wolf Report. He was a founder of the Greater Yellowstone Coalition. He and Jackie Johnson Maughan wrote three editions of "Hiking Idaho." He also wrote "Beyond the Tetons" and "Backpacking Wyoming's Teton and Washakie Wilderness." He created and is the administrator of The Wildlife News.
5 Responses to With almost none of Obama's Interior nominees confirmed and in office, Harry Reid decides to take on a Republican filibuster so to seat Salazar's number two position
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Recent Posts
- A Greater Yellowstone National Park Proposal July 5, 2022
- Key Impacts of Livestock Production (not just grazing) Upon the Land. June 21, 2022
- Climate Not Fuels Drive Large Blazes June 21, 2022
- Wolves in the West are collateral damage of human selfishness June 16, 2022
- Targeted Grazing–The Latest Magical Solution To Improve Rangeland Health June 16, 2022
Recent Comments
- Michael Kellett on A Greater Yellowstone National Park Proposal
- Rich on A Greater Yellowstone National Park Proposal
- Michael Lewis on A Greater Yellowstone National Park Proposal
- Chris Zinda on A Greater Yellowstone National Park Proposal
- Chris Zinda on A Greater Yellowstone National Park Proposal
- Mike Higgins on A Greater Yellowstone National Park Proposal
- Susan Rhem-Westhoff on A Greater Yellowstone National Park Proposal
- Mark L on A Greater Yellowstone National Park Proposal
- Beeline on A Greater Yellowstone National Park Proposal
- Mark L on A Greater Yellowstone National Park Proposal
- Johns David on A Greater Yellowstone National Park Proposal
- Michael Anthony on A Greater Yellowstone National Park Proposal
- Pamela W on A Greater Yellowstone National Park Proposal
- Michael Kellett on A Greater Yellowstone National Park Proposal
- Mark L on Wolves in the West are collateral damage of human selfishness
Perhaps Salazar should take note as to what is happening. With good people, whom we can rely on, may be able to get past the filibuster.
Rick
Kennedy, Kerry & Mukulski were absent. Reid says they will be there next week. That gives him 61 and he can call for a new vote because he voted no in order to preserve the call for that new vote.
Don
The Republicans left in the Senate are really taking this “Party of No” stuff seriously! 😉
Given Salazar’s background and actions so far, this whole situation should be a clear lesson on the effectiveness of compromise, collaboration, and, frankly, appeasement. Obama could have gone ahead and nominated Grijalva and gotten this much cooperation.
Milkarooni,
I think you are absolutely right. How could a Grijalva nomination have done worse? Plus, conservation groups would be actively helping push the nominations rather than sitting and watching events.